From: <Web...@St...> - 2003-10-21 01:03:31
|
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Eric Ridge wrote: | On Oct 20, 2003, at 3:24 AM, Endre St=F8lsvik wrote: | > Why would one want to be removed from Gump, really? To become less | > available? | | Having another entity broadcast that we don't build under their system | (maybe we don't build at all, haven't checked CVS in awhile) just | doesn't seem like a good idea. Esp. when that entity is our #1 | competitor. I thought that gump was a much larger entity than Jakarta. I thought that "gumping" was a way of fetching your dependencies.. Hmm E. |