Re: [Webmacro-devel] Gump build issue...

[Brian G. <br...@qu...>]

>On Oct 20, 2003, at 3:24 AM, Endre St=F8lsvik wrote:
>>Why would one want to be removed from Gump, really? To become less
>>available?
>
>Having another entity broadcast that we don't build under their system=20
>(maybe we don't build at all, haven't checked CVS in awhile) just doesn't=
=20
>seem like a good idea.  Esp. when that entity is our #1 competitor.

I think this is kind of backwards reasoning.  I think that being supported=
=20
under Gump is a good thing which increases WM's reach.  I don't buy the=20
"competitor" argument.  I think the Gump folks were really trying to be=20
helpful and we were silly to tell them to go away.  It makes us look like=20
an island, and no project can afford to be an island.



--
Brian Goetz
Quiotix Corporation
br...@qu...           Tel: 650-843-1300            Fax: 650-324-8032

http://www.quiotix.com