From: Lane S. <la...@op...> - 2003-07-27 02:06:16
|
Marc Palmer wrote: > On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 13:46:36 -0700, Lane Sharman <la...@op...> > wrote: > > I'm really not sure. I was using Provider terminology because I > thought you guys would prefer that - in keeping with existing WM > paradigms. > > Will this, in your mind, be a 100% replaceable mechanism for returning > new instances of objects only when required, with only one instance of > this "factory" per Broker? Yes. There will be one instance per broker. This is in my original proposal. -Lane |