From: Marc P. <ma...@an...> - 2003-07-14 16:49:15
|
Hi, I'm trying to find a solution to this longstanding binary operator set bug in WM. It is painfully difficult to modify PropertyOperatorCache. It's a very important part of WM and it is bordering on unmaintainable due to the complex interactions and recursion that occurs to attempt to locate direct or binary accessors. I really think this needs to be reshaped for 2.0 - and I'd like to be able to do it myself (right now, because I really need this bug fixed) but I just don't have the in-depth knowledge of WM to get this right. For example, I discovered (partly to my horror) that WM supports "PropertyMethod" - a way of getting a property NAME from a function: #set $propnameProvider.SomeProp = "marc" #set $var = $propnameProvider.get("SomeProp").SomeOtherProp This looks somewhat bizarre and horrendous to me. Does -anybody-actually use it? Marc -- Marc Palmer Contract Java Consultant/Developer * Available For Hire * See my CV at http://www.anyware.co.uk/marc/ |