Re: [Webmacro-devel] Capitalised properties in WM, why?!

[Eric B. R. <eb...@tc...>]

On Friday, April 4, 2003, at 03:06  PM, kea...@na...=20
wrote:

> Ultimately how WMScript properties are translated into Java properties=20=

> is a question of style.=A0 The choice was made years ago, and it seems=20=

> senseless to revisit it now.

I couldn't agree more!   :)

eric

>
> Keats
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Marc Palmer [mailto:ma...@an...]
> > Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 1:38 PM
> > To: la...@op...
> > Cc: web...@li...
> > Subject: Re: [Webmacro-devel] Capitalised properties in WM, why?!
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 04 Apr 2003 07:53:49 -0800, Lane Sharman =
<la...@op...>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I think we had a discussion about this some time ago and I voiced =
a
> > > similar concern. You can today say $instance.value to
> > obtain a bean value
> > > but the member will have to be public. I would imagine it would be
> > > possible to add a heuristic:
> > >
> > > search object.property --> object.getProperty().
> >
> > Yes maybe we should. I can appreciate that most people using
> > WM would be
> > completely unaware of the javabean mnituae in this respect.
> >
> > There might be complications where get(Object key)/set(Object
> > key, Object
> > value) is used.
> >
> > Anyone else got thoughts on this? -- Marc Palmer
> >
>