From: Marc P. <ma...@an...> - 2003-04-04 18:37:11
|
On Fri, 04 Apr 2003 07:53:49 -0800, Lane Sharman <la...@op...> wrote: > I think we had a discussion about this some time ago and I voiced a > similar concern. You can today say $instance.value to obtain a bean value > but the member will have to be public. I would imagine it would be > possible to add a heuristic: > > search object.property --> object.getProperty(). Yes maybe we should. I can appreciate that most people using WM would be completely unaware of the javabean mnituae in this respect. There might be complications where get(Object key)/set(Object key, Object value) is used. Anyone else got thoughts on this? -- Marc Palmer |