From: Marc P. <ma...@an...> - 2003-04-02 22:28:53
|
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003 16:49:53 -0500, Eric B. Ridge <eb...@tc...> wrote: > Hell, should we just rip out our log stuff and replace it with Log4J? I > bet this would make a lot of folks happy... I've never used Log4J but > have heard it's just great and have considered using it here at TCDI... > I wouldn't mind hooking it into WebMacro first, mainly to find out if it > sucks or not. Well... I don't think we should tie WM to another non-JDK API. I haven't used Log4J and we have our own logging apis... abstracted so we can use any underlying log transport - much like WM but simpler. If anything, we should make it use the JDK 1.4 logging api... but that has obvious bad side-effects! >> I can create a test case if anybody wants to take a look at this. > > sure. I'll be glad to investigate if you'll make a test. As per my post, I've got a feeling this is linked to multiple WM instances. I have a feeling some log target stuff is getting confused between WM instances. I will test this shortly... I just need to add another module to my webapp config and if I get 3 copies of all log entries... then we know I'm right :) Marc |