From: Marc P. <ma...@an...> - 2003-01-17 11:55:54
|
Hi all, Well we've racked up an amazing 4000 page views on the 15th Jan on SF as a result of the press release. However downloads were not in proportion to this based on previous figures. I was wondering if anybody had any thoughts on why this might be. A "page view" is, I imagine, a client viewing any of the SF pages for WM, including the download page. I wonder why so many people make it to the download page and then decide not to download. Any ideas? It seems very odd that so many people will fall at the last hurdle. Here's the stats for the last few days. The PR went out on the 13th so you can see how accesses have ramped up. Prior to this, our daily average downloads was around 35 (guesstimate based on SF figures) and page views were averaging around the 600 per day mark (another educated guesstimate). Date Page views Downloads ---------------------------------------------------- 15 Jan 2003 4,092 90 14 Jan 2003 2,424 103 13 Jan 2003 1,702 71 12 Jan 2003 287 7 11 Jan 2003 13 1 10 Jan 2003 467 8 We really should try to work out how to turn these 4000 interested people into WM users! A download rate of only 2% is pretty poor. All I can think of is that maybe some people are looking around the rest of the SF project site for activity, bug reports etc. to assess the "activity" of the project. If so they are getting a skewed view because we don't fully use SF. Alternatively, they are being put off by the switch to the SF site for downloads, whereas downloads direct from the WM site might fare better as it's all within the cosy atmosphere of the WM site and there is a "context" to everything. Eric - can we "grep -c" access_log on webmacro.org to get the download stats for the last few days? Without a log analyser it's going to be a tricky regex to stats per day though. -- Marc Palmer |