From: <web...@st...> - 2002-11-28 13:53:23
|
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Marc Palmer wrote: | | > However, THAT isn't too cool. This because I'll probably need to _use_ | the | > library, especially program to it. That means that I'll load the | > source-jar into the IDE to get parameter naming and Javadoc integration, | > as e.g. CodeGuide from Omnicore.com does (man, I just love that | program!). | > The OS project Eclipse (from IBM) is also cool and does this. Which means | > that I'd like to have the source in a jar, yes, please! | | Source should be in a ZIP, not a jar... in my opinion. Why? Officially, Java "deprecated" the zip extension in 1.1 or something. But Eric: One more major thing: You _got_ to have a directory prepended!!! I nearly expanded the tarball in my /usr/java, but thankfully I did actually a "t" first. And I got _scared_, man! Please, prepend the stash with a webmacro-1.1b2/-directory. That is, _with_ the version. Look to Jakarta, that jakarta-tomcat-4.1.12 prepended directory is actually pretty OK. And then you of course make a symlink, tomcat4->jakarta-tomcat-4.1.12, so that you don't have to change your 387953 startupscripts when 4.1.13 comes out. And indeed, I'd like the jars to be version-named too. This so that I really easily can see which version of some jar I'm using. I always rename the jar, so why can't it just be named such from the beginning? Use symlinks on _OS_'es.. ;) -- Mvh, Endre Stølsvik M[+47 93054050] F[+47 51625182] Developer @ CoreTrek AS - http://www.coretrek.com/ CoreTrek corporate portal / EIP - http://www.corelets.com/ |