From: Marc P. <ma...@an...> - 2002-11-28 13:06:46
|
> However, THAT isn't too cool. This because I'll probably need to _use_= =20 the > library, especially program to it. That means that I'll load the > source-jar into the IDE to get parameter naming and Javadoc integratio= n, > as e.g. CodeGuide from Omnicore.com does (man, I just love that=20 program!). > The OS project Eclipse (from IBM) is also cool and does this. Which me= ans > that I'd like to have the source in a jar, yes, please! Source should be in a ZIP, not a jar... in my opinion. For our projects we always build a code .jar, a source .zip, and a=20 javadoc .zip From there (using ANT) it is trivial to make a "total download" single=20= ZIP containing the nested zips, or the whole structure as is on the buil= d=20 tree. Gotta love ANT. We've just been doing some work on a release for a new project, and we'v= e=20 really upped the amount of ANT automation. We are using my AntWMCompile = project (a new version of the thing that used to be in contrib!)=20 extensively to build all our READMEs and LICENSEs with parameterized=20= version numbers, product names, revision history, file lists etc. It's going pretty well, but it could do with being a bit cleaner. The=20= AntWMCompile project (a complete distro including ANT, WM and my tool an= d=20 a simple example) will be available soon, if anyone wants to try it, let= =20 me know... brilliant for building any kind of offline/static content. Marc |