Re: [Webmacro-devel] Who wants a Beta release?

[Lane <la...@sa...>]

http://www.webmacro.org/MacroDirective
Re Lane documenting #macro: I would be happy to if I knew the first thing 
about how it worked ... its ins and outs and conventions. Like can you have 
a library of macros and how to properly organize? Can you call a macro 
recursively? Are there issues pertaining to explicit and implicit scope of 
a declaration inside a macro? Does a reference introduced in a macro 
survive its execution?

If anyone other than Brian has a good clue on the above, I am happy to 
collaborate and proof but I am definitely not the gospel on this subject. 
If you are knowledgeable about the macro directive the above link is where 
to document it.

http://www.webmacro.org/MethodReference
Also, on the topic of documentation, who did the methodizing stuff? Can 
they document this at the above url.

btw: isn't wiki just fantastic???

Eric: I will work with folks on this so you can concentrate on the release. 
Please plan that it __will__ get done.

methodizer, macro experts: please work with me to accomplish the 1.1 
updates to the wm site!

-lane



At 12:19 AM 11/1/2002 -0500, Eric B. Ridge wrote:
>Since some folks have been nagging for quite some time about a beta 
>release, let's do one Monday, November 4th.
>
>Could I convince somebody to write up some documentation on the website 
>about #macro?  Lane?
>
>eric
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) 
>technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. 
>http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en
>_______________________________________________
>Webmacro-devel mailing list
>Web...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webmacro-devel

Lane Sharman
CTO, Open Doors Software