From: E. S. <En...@St...> - 2008-08-18 13:55:17
|
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 9:52 PM, Tim Pizey <ti...@pa...> wrote: > Hi Endre, > > On Monday 04 August 2008 13:26:37 Endre Stølsvik wrote: >> What happened to the improvements that was implemented by some dude >> that suddenly started posting a while back (a year, maybe more). In >> particular, he did some profiling, and found both huge memory "errors" >> (some huge byte-arrays that were allocated, never used, and then >> nulled, IIRC - in the "FastWriter" stuff, the bugs had appeared in the >> refactorings away from the object pooling), and performance >> improvements. He supplied patches, but I don't remember whether they >> actully ever got into CVS. > > > I am fairly sure that this question has been asked before, and that the answer > was yes, they were incorporated. I actually KNOW I have asked it at least TWICE before, and that the question have never been answered. Or that it was answered once, in a "I kinda think so, but not sure"-style. Thus, I ask again, for the people in the know to actually check it out - it can't be that difficult to do once you have the build in some IDE, and know the layout of the stuff. Maybe check the few commits that was done in the two years prior to the flurry of commits that just was done.. >> Furthermore, I think a new release would do heaps of good. Just do a >> build, tag it whatever, and stick it onto some site. > > This is done: see http://webmacro.sourceforge.net/project-summary.html > the current tag version is 2.1-RC1-SNAPSHOT Nice! I must have missed the post. > > The built jars are available here: > http://webmacro.sourceforge.net/maven2/org/webmacro/webmacro/2.1-RC1-SNAPSHOT/ > > What more are you looking for? Not much, really - maybe drop the "RC1" part? What's the point of it, when there is NO activity left in the project? Just to make people uncertain about the quality of the build? - because that is an obvious result of that name. Thanks, Endre. |