From: François-Xavier B. <fra...@ce...> - 2013-02-08 09:02:18
|
Hi Nicolas, +1 for me. Anyway we need to rewrite the Jetty code. I also read some articles about Jetty 9 performance and it looks really interesting. FX On 05/02/2013 12:50, Nicolas Richeton wrote: > Hi all, > > We are using jetty for esigate-server module (standalone). > > - The new jetty 9 is in RC [1] , with Better performances [2] : > > " Thus for a small increase in static heap usage (0.5MB in the static > Tries), jetty-9 out performs jetty-8 by 30% faster (33.5s vs 48.6s) > and 50% less YG garbage (1409MB vs 2914MB) which trigger less than > half the YG collections." > > - Jetty 8 (current) has support for SPDY v3 > > I think we should try jetty 9 as soon as possible, give a way to > enable spdy support easily, do some testing tomcat vs jetty and > increase production-like testing on esigate-server. > > Having a good and fast standalone esigate server seems important to me. > Any thoughts ? > -- > Nicolas > > [1] > http://nofluffjuststuff.com/blog/simone_bordet/2013/01/jetty_9_goes_fast_with_mechanical_sympathy?utm_source=blogitem&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=blogrss > > [2] http://webtide.intalio.com/2012/08/jetty-9-its-coming/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer > Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 > and get the hardware for free! Learn more. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb > > > _______________________________________________ > Webassembletool-devel mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webassembletool-devel |