From: Bart K. <ba...@cl...> - 2004-03-30 00:34:16
|
Jamie Cameron wrote: >On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 04:24, Martin Mewes wrote: > > >>Hi Jamie, >> >>Am Montag, 29. März 2004 13:34 schrieb Jamie Cameron: >> >> >> >>>Thanks for pointing that out - this is a bug in 1.139, that will be >>>fixed before the 1.140 release. >>> >>>How different are SMBFS and CIFS anyway? I have been assuming up to >>>now that they are pretty much just different names for the same >>>thing .. >>> >>> >>In addition: I setup a fresh SuSE 9.0 and installed the latest >>devel-rpm packages. Well in the RPM there is no CIFS, but SMBFS >>instead. >> >>Bug or Feature ;-) ? >> >> > >The current 1.139 version of webmin looks for the mount.cifs command, >and if found assumes that CIFS is being used instead of SMBFS. Since >this is not the correct thing to do, version 1.140 will allow the use of >both. > >Oddly, the latest Fedora seems to have replaced smbfs with cifs, which >is why I initially made that change. > > - Jamie > > And thank you for it very much :) aparently development of smbmnt is dead unlike the devel of cifs which is very much active. > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials >Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of >GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system >administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click >- >Forwarded by the Webmin development list at web...@we... >To remove yourself from this list, go to >http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-devel > > > > > -- ____________________________________________________ Bart Kalita MCP Registered Linux user #347493 Fedora Core 2 www.bart-domain.com www.astradine.no-ip.org |