Re: [Waba-spec] Topic "'Java-like' classes to implement"
Status: Abandoned
Brought to you by:
bornet
From: Guilherme H. <gu...@us...> - 2001-10-08 16:20:15
|
>>> I know I'm one week too late... Sorry. To continue the discution, and don't block more time, here is the start of the discution for the topic "Java-like" classes to implement". <<< Are we trying to reinvent the wheel? Aren't there other tools that implements the full set of Java in the devices? Why are we going in the same direction? My opinion regarding this is: keep waba small as possible. Implementing too much classes wont make it powerful. People like Waba bc it is small and powerful. Those ones i agree with: > Class > Exception ? > Math > Object > String > StringBuffer > System > Enumeration > Hashtable > Random > Stack > Vector >>> Next week (Monday, I will do my best this time...), I will close the two topics : this one and the last one (). <<< I think that the discussion about the "Common File System or Database format" should come on again, and we must put an agreement on them. It is very important, and i have not agreed with some of its topics. Sorry if i'm been annoying, but in reality we didnt putted any point into votation. Also, how many people still interested in this specification? I'm not seeing posts of everybody that is assigned to it. guich |