Re: [Waba-spec] Topic "'Java-like' classes to implement"

[Guilherme H. <gu...@us...>]

>>>
I know I'm one week too late... Sorry. To continue the discution, and
don't block more time, here is the start of the discution for the topic
"Java-like" classes to implement".
<<<

    Are we trying to reinvent the wheel? Aren't there other tools that
implements the full set of Java in the devices? Why are we going in the same
direction?

    My opinion regarding this is: keep waba small as possible. Implementing
too much classes wont make it powerful. People like Waba bc it is small and
powerful.

    Those ones i agree with:

> Class
> Exception ?
> Math
> Object
> String
> StringBuffer
> System
> Enumeration
> Hashtable
> Random
> Stack
> Vector

>>>
Next week (Monday, I will do my best this time...), I will close the two
topics : this one and the last one ().
<<<

       I think that the discussion about the "Common File System or Database
format" should come on again, and we must put an agreement on them. It is
very important, and i have not agreed with some of its topics.

      Sorry if i'm been annoying, but in reality we didnt putted any point
into votation.

      Also, how many people still interested in this specification? I'm not
seeing posts of everybody that is assigned to it.

      guich