RE: [Vxl-users] Test coverage of vxl

[Blezek, D. J (CRD) <bl...@cr...>]

Peter,

  If a file named .NoDartCoverage exists in a source directory, that directory isn't considered for
coverage information.  It's work a pass through the netlib, jpeg, zlib directories sprinkling this
file around to help give a more accurate view of coverage data.

-dan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pet...@es...
> [mailto:Pet...@es...]
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 10:28 AM
> To: vxl...@li...; Blezek, Daniel J (CRD)
> Subject: RE: [Vxl-users] Test coverage of vxl
> 
> 
> > In VTK, the tests also serve as examples of how to use the software,
> > and are valuable for more than just testing.
> 
> This is also true for vxl.
> 
> Actually, the vxl 41% is bit of an underestimation
> since it includes a lot of non-tested code lines in
> v3p/netlib, v3p/jpeg, v3p/zlib etc, which should not be visible.
> But even after filtering those out, we only get at about 66%.
> This could easily become 80% with just a little bit of effort...
> 
> 
> 	Peter.
>