I did not follow this issue closely,  but I feel like namespaces are so much better supported now compared to early 2000's that I am comfortable allowing namespaces in vxl core.  (Just my two cents)

Regards,
Gehua

On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Peter Vanroose <peter_vanroose@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
Is there general agreement on this change (and implicitly on now allowing namespaces in vxl core)?

If so, I'll apply the change from "class vnl_math" to "namespace vnl_math" by the end of this week.

--      Peter.


-- On 2012-10-19 Amitha Perera <amithaperera@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> [...] I support applying this patch.  Namespaces are well-enough
> supported that this will not create any real issues.























--

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
_______________________________________________
Vxl-maintainers mailing list
Vxl-maintainers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vxl-maintainers