Menu
▾
▴
vtd-xml-users
|
From: Harrie H. <Har...@KB...> - 2006-11-06 09:46:10
|
Hello,
I had a question about the built-in entity references. You support, as
told on the website only a few:
" &s; ' > <
Q1: I was wondering why is it not & and &apo; as in the standard?=20
For example a lot of parsers do not understand &s; but do understand
&=20
=20
Now, I have to adapt my xml, or the VTD code. I am looking at this
function getCharResolved() from VTDNav.
If you look at the swich, after the & sign, it detects this:
=20
case 'a' :
ch =3D getCharUnit(offset);
if (ch =3D=3D 'm') {
if (getCharUnit(offset + 1) =3D=3D 'p'
&& getCharUnit(offset + 2) =3D=3D =
';') {
inc =3D 5;
val =3D '&';
} else
throw new NavException("illegal
builtin reference");
} else if (ch =3D=3D 'p') {
if (getCharUnit(offset + 1) =3D=3D 'o'
&& getCharUnit(offset + 2) =3D=3D =
's'
&& getCharUnit(offset + 3) =3D=3D =
';') {
inc =3D 6;
val =3D '\'';
} else
throw new NavException("illegal
builtin reference");
} else
throw new NavException("illegal builtin
reference");
break;
=20
Which in translation is amp; and apos;
=20
Now it realy is getting confusing.
If a put &s; in my xml, it throws an exception any way:
"javax.ejb.EJBException: com.ximpleware.EntityException: Errors in
Entity: Illegal builtin reference" on line 499 in VTDGen.
If I put & in my xml I get a: "NavException: Invalid entity char" on
line 830 in VTDNav.
Of which you can see the code above, which should work for &.
Also the & is supported in VTDNav, if I see correct on line 740, but
also gets a exception
What is going on?
Mabey it's in this piece of code on line 729 in VTDNav:
=20
ch =3D (int)l;
=20
if (ch !=3D '&')
return l;
=20
I have some time to correct this. What is the problem? Why did you block
it out like that?
=20
Harrie Hoogeveen
=20
=20
|
|
From: John K. - K. I. NL <jk...@in...> - 2006-11-06 10:35:55
|
In the new code this actually has nothing to do with "&s;" - there is
no such check, my guess it's a typo of the website. It does have to do
something with offsets:
For the package I built, add a ++ after offset in getChar() (in the
function getCharResolved())
Example, it was this:
static Long getCharResolved(VTDNav *vn,int offset){
exception e;
int ch =3D 0;
int val =3D 0;
Long inc =3D2;
Long l =3D getChar(vn,offset);
Change it to:
static Long getCharResolved(VTDNav *vn,int offset){
exception e;
int ch =3D 0;
int val =3D 0;
Long inc =3D2;
Long l =3D getChar(vn,offset++);
I'm not sure if this'll work on older versions.
In a new version I threw in a bunch of typecasts too, to get rid of
those pesky compiler warnings (on HP-UX a killer), but I'll release the
package somewhat later when I'm convinced it works.
Regards,
John Kraal
Harrie Hoogeveen wrote:
> Hello,
>=20
> I had a question about the built-in entity references. You support, as
> told on the website only a few:
>=20
> " &s; ' > <
>=20
> Q1: I was wondering why is it not & and &apo; as in the standard?
>=20
> For example a lot of parsers do not understand &s; but do understand
> &
>=20
> =20
>=20
> Now, I have to adapt my xml, or the VTD code. I am looking at this
> function getCharResolved() from VTDNav.
>=20
> If you look at the swich, after the & sign, it detects this:
>=20
> =20
>=20
> *case* 'a' :
>=20
> ch =3D getCharUnit(offset);
>=20
> *if* (ch =3D=3D 'm') {
>=20
> *if* (getCharUnit(offset + 1) =3D=3D 'p'
>=20
> && getCharUnit(offset + 2) =3D=3D '=
;') {
>=20
> inc =3D 5;
>=20
> val =3D '&';
>=20
> } *else*
>=20
> *throw* *new* NavException("illegal
> builtin reference");
>=20
> } *else* *if* (ch =3D=3D 'p') {
>=20
> *if* (getCharUnit(offset + 1) =3D=3D 'o'
>=20
> && getCharUnit(offset + 2) =3D=3D '=
s'
>=20
> && getCharUnit(offset + 3) =3D=3D '=
;') {
>=20
> inc =3D 6;
>=20
> val =3D '\'';
>=20
> } *else*
>=20
> *throw* *new* NavException("illegal
> builtin reference");
>=20
> } *else*
>=20
> *throw* *new* NavException("illegal
> builtin reference");
>=20
> *break*;
>=20
> =20
>=20
> Which in translation is amp; and apos;
>=20
> =20
>=20
> Now it realy is getting confusing.
>=20
> If a put &s; in my xml, it throws an exception any way:
> =E2=80=9Cjavax.ejb.EJBException: com.ximpleware.EntityException: Errors=
in
> Entity: Illegal builtin reference=E2=80=9D on line 499 in VTDGen.
>=20
> If I put & in my xml I get a: =E2=80=9CNavException: Invalid entity=
char=E2=80=9D on
> line 830 in VTDNav.
>=20
> Of which you can see the code above, which should work for &.
>=20
> Also the & is supported in VTDNav, if I see correct on line 740, bu=
t
> also gets a exception
>=20
> What is going on?
>=20
> Mabey it=E2=80=99s in this piece of code on line 729 in VTDNav:
>=20
> =20
>=20
> ch =3D (*int*)l;
>=20
> =20
>=20
> *if* (ch !=3D '&')
>=20
> *return* l;
>=20
> =20
>=20
> I have some time to correct this. What is the problem? Why did you bloc=
k
> it out like that?
>=20
> =20
>=20
> Harrie Hoogeveen
>=20
> =20
>=20
> =20
>=20
>=20
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------=
-
>=20
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------=
--
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, securit=
y?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job =
easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geron=
imo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=
=3D121642
>=20
>=20
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------=
-
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> Vtd-xml-users mailing list
> Vtd...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vtd-xml-users
--=20
Met vriendelijke groeten,
With kind regards,
John Kraal
Programmer
Kewill Interchain
A member of the Kewill Group of companies
(T) +31 (0)78 6 123 310
(E) jk...@in...
(W) www.interchain.nl
IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail, and each of any attachments transmitted
with it, is confidential, is the property of Kewill Interchain, and is
intended solely for the information of the individual/entity to whom
this e-mail is addressed. It may also be privileged or protected by
other legal rules. If you have received it by mistake, please notify the
author immediately by replying to this e-mail and then destroy/delete
this e-mail and all attachments (if any). If you are not the intended
recipient you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print, or rely
on this e-mail. In accordance with Kewill Interchain's internal policy
e-mails sent and/or received may be monitored. Whilst Kewill Interchain
takes reasonable precautions (including use of anti-virus software) it
accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage should this e-mail
contain any virus, or similar destructive or mischievous code. (c)
Kewill Interchain 2006.
|
|
From: John K. - K. I. NL <jk...@in...> - 2006-11-06 10:51:37
|
Oops,
I'm using c_1.7, not the java-one. Though it seems the errors have the
same origin.
Kind regards,
John Kraal
John Kraal - Kewill Interchain NL wrote:
> In the new code this actually has nothing to do with "&s;" - there i=
s
> no such check, my guess it's a typo of the website. It does have to do
> something with offsets:
>=20
> For the package I built, add a ++ after offset in getChar() (in the
> function getCharResolved())
>=20
> Example, it was this:
>=20
> static Long getCharResolved(VTDNav *vn,int offset)=
{
> exception e;
> int ch =3D 0;
> int val =3D 0;
> Long inc =3D2;
> Long l =3D getChar(vn,offset);
>=20
> Change it to:
>=20
> static Long getCharResolved(VTDNav *vn,int offset)=
{
> exception e;
> int ch =3D 0;
> int val =3D 0;
> Long inc =3D2;
> Long l =3D getChar(vn,offset++);
>=20
> I'm not sure if this'll work on older versions.
>=20
> In a new version I threw in a bunch of typecasts too, to get rid of
> those pesky compiler warnings (on HP-UX a killer), but I'll release the
> package somewhat later when I'm convinced it works.
>=20
> Regards,
> John Kraal
>=20
>=20
> Harrie Hoogeveen wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I had a question about the built-in entity references. You support, as
>> told on the website only a few:
>>
>> " &s; ' > <
>>
>> Q1: I was wondering why is it not & and &apo; as in the standard?
>>
>> For example a lot of parsers do not understand &s; but do understan=
d
>> &
>>
>> =20
>>
>> Now, I have to adapt my xml, or the VTD code. I am looking at this
>> function getCharResolved() from VTDNav.
>>
>> If you look at the swich, after the & sign, it detects this:
>>
>> =20
>>
>> *case* 'a' :
>>
>> ch =3D getCharUnit(offset);
>>
>> *if* (ch =3D=3D 'm') {
>>
>> *if* (getCharUnit(offset + 1) =3D=3D 'p'
>>
>> && getCharUnit(offset + 2) =3D=3D =
';') {
>>
>> inc =3D 5;
>>
>> val =3D '&';
>>
>> } *else*
>>
>> *throw* *new* NavException("illega=
l
>> builtin reference");
>>
>> } *else* *if* (ch =3D=3D 'p') {
>>
>> *if* (getCharUnit(offset + 1) =3D=3D 'o'
>>
>> && getCharUnit(offset + 2) =3D=3D =
's'
>>
>> && getCharUnit(offset + 3) =3D=3D =
';') {
>>
>> inc =3D 6;
>>
>> val =3D '\'';
>>
>> } *else*
>>
>> *throw* *new* NavException("illega=
l
>> builtin reference");
>>
>> } *else*
>>
>> *throw* *new* NavException("illegal
>> builtin reference");
>>
>> *break*;
>>
>> =20
>>
>> Which in translation is amp; and apos;
>>
>> =20
>>
>> Now it realy is getting confusing.
>>
>> If a put &s; in my xml, it throws an exception any way:
>> =E2=80=9Cjavax.ejb.EJBException: com.ximpleware.EntityException: Error=
s in
>> Entity: Illegal builtin reference=E2=80=9D on line 499 in VTDGen.
>>
>> If I put & in my xml I get a: =E2=80=9CNavException: Invalid entit=
y char=E2=80=9D on
>> line 830 in VTDNav.
>>
>> Of which you can see the code above, which should work for &.
>>
>> Also the & is supported in VTDNav, if I see correct on line 740, b=
ut
>> also gets a exception
>>
>> What is going on?
>>
>> Mabey it=E2=80=99s in this piece of code on line 729 in VTDNav:
>>
>> =20
>>
>> ch =3D (*int*)l;
>>
>> =20
>>
>> *if* (ch !=3D '&')
>>
>> *return* l;
>>
>> =20
>>
>> I have some time to correct this. What is the problem? Why did you blo=
ck
>> it out like that?
>>
>> =20
>>
>> Harrie Hoogeveen
>>
>> =20
>>
>> =20
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------=
--
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------=
---
>> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, securi=
ty?
>> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job=
easier
>> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Gero=
nimo
>> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&da=
t=3D121642
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------=
--
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Vtd-xml-users mailing list
>> Vtd...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vtd-xml-users
>=20
|
|
From: Jimmy Z. <cra...@co...> - 2006-11-06 18:06:25
|
They should have the same issue since the porting is a literal translation
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Kraal - Kewill Interchain NL" <jk...@in...>
To: "John Kraal - Kewill Interchain NL" <jk...@in...>
Cc: "Harrie Hoogeveen" <Har...@KB...>;
<vtd...@li...>
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 2:51 AM
Subject: Re: [Vtd-xml-users] built-in entity references
> Oops,
>
> I'm using c_1.7, not the java-one. Though it seems the errors have the
> same origin.
>
> Kind regards,
> John Kraal
>
> John Kraal - Kewill Interchain NL wrote:
>> In the new code this actually has nothing to do with "&s;" - there is
>> no such check, my guess it's a typo of the website. It does have to do
>> something with offsets:
>>
>> For the package I built, add a ++ after offset in getChar() (in the
>> function getCharResolved())
>>
>> Example, it was this:
>>
>> static Long getCharResolved(VTDNav *vn,int offset){
>> exception e;
>> int ch = 0;
>> int val = 0;
>> Long inc =2;
>> Long l = getChar(vn,offset);
>>
>> Change it to:
>>
>> static Long getCharResolved(VTDNav *vn,int offset){
>> exception e;
>> int ch = 0;
>> int val = 0;
>> Long inc =2;
>> Long l = getChar(vn,offset++);
>>
>> I'm not sure if this'll work on older versions.
>>
>> In a new version I threw in a bunch of typecasts too, to get rid of
>> those pesky compiler warnings (on HP-UX a killer), but I'll release the
>> package somewhat later when I'm convinced it works.
>>
>> Regards,
>> John Kraal
>>
>>
>> Harrie Hoogeveen wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I had a question about the built-in entity references. You support, as
>>> told on the website only a few:
>>>
>>> " &s; ' > <
>>>
>>> Q1: I was wondering why is it not & and &apo; as in the standard?
>>>
>>> For example a lot of parsers do not understand &s; but do understand
>>> &
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Now, I have to adapt my xml, or the VTD code. I am looking at this
>>> function getCharResolved() from VTDNav.
>>>
>>> If you look at the swich, after the & sign, it detects this:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *case* 'a' :
>>>
>>> ch = getCharUnit(offset);
>>>
>>> *if* (ch == 'm') {
>>>
>>> *if* (getCharUnit(offset + 1) == 'p'
>>>
>>> && getCharUnit(offset + 2) == ';') {
>>>
>>> inc = 5;
>>>
>>> val = '&';
>>>
>>> } *else*
>>>
>>> *throw* *new* NavException("illegal
>>> builtin reference");
>>>
>>> } *else* *if* (ch == 'p') {
>>>
>>> *if* (getCharUnit(offset + 1) == 'o'
>>>
>>> && getCharUnit(offset + 2) == 's'
>>>
>>> && getCharUnit(offset + 3) == ';') {
>>>
>>> inc = 6;
>>>
>>> val = '\'';
>>>
>>> } *else*
>>>
>>> *throw* *new* NavException("illegal
>>> builtin reference");
>>>
>>> } *else*
>>>
>>> *throw* *new* NavException("illegal
>>> builtin reference");
>>>
>>> *break*;
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Which in translation is amp; and apos;
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Now it realy is getting confusing.
>>>
>>> If a put &s; in my xml, it throws an exception any way:
>>> “javax.ejb.EJBException: com.ximpleware.EntityException: Errors in
>>> Entity: Illegal builtin reference” on line 499 in VTDGen.
>>>
>>> If I put & in my xml I get a: “NavException: Invalid entity char” on
>>> line 830 in VTDNav.
>>>
>>> Of which you can see the code above, which should work for &.
>>>
>>> Also the & is supported in VTDNav, if I see correct on line 740, but
>>> also gets a exception
>>>
>>> What is going on?
>>>
>>> Mabey it’s in this piece of code on line 729 in VTDNav:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ch = (*int*)l;
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *if* (ch != '&')
>>>
>>> *return* l;
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I have some time to correct this. What is the problem? Why did you block
>>> it out like that?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Harrie Hoogeveen
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services,
>>> security?
>>> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
>>> easier
>>> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache
>>> Geronimo
>>> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Vtd-xml-users mailing list
>>> Vtd...@li...
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vtd-xml-users
>>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
> easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> Vtd-xml-users mailing list
> Vtd...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vtd-xml-users
>
|
|
From: John K. - K. I. NL <jk...@in...> - 2006-11-07 07:34:26
|
And I've posted the solution; just increment offset before the next
getChar() (or GetCharUnit()).
Jimmy Zhang wrote:
> They should have the same issue since the porting is a literal translat=
ion
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Kraal - Kewill Interchain NL"
> <jk...@in...>
> To: "John Kraal - Kewill Interchain NL" <jk...@in...>
> Cc: "Harrie Hoogeveen" <Har...@KB...>;
> <vtd...@li...>
> Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 2:51 AM
> Subject: Re: [Vtd-xml-users] built-in entity references
>=20
>=20
>> Oops,
>>
>> I'm using c_1.7, not the java-one. Though it seems the errors have the
>> same origin.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> John Kraal
>>
>> John Kraal - Kewill Interchain NL wrote:
>>> In the new code this actually has nothing to do with "&s;" - there=
is
>>> no such check, my guess it's a typo of the website. It does have to d=
o
>>> something with offsets:
>>>
>>> For the package I built, add a ++ after offset in getChar() (in the
>>> function getCharResolved())
>>>
>>> Example, it was this:
>>>
>>> static Long getCharResolved(VTDNav *vn,int offse=
t){
>>> exception e;
>>> int ch =3D 0;
>>> int val =3D 0;
>>> Long inc =3D2;
>>> Long l =3D getChar(vn,offset);
>>>
>>> Change it to:
>>>
>>> static Long getCharResolved(VTDNav *vn,int offse=
t){
>>> exception e;
>>> int ch =3D 0;
>>> int val =3D 0;
>>> Long inc =3D2;
>>> Long l =3D getChar(vn,offset++);
>>>
>>> I'm not sure if this'll work on older versions.
>>>
>>> In a new version I threw in a bunch of typecasts too, to get rid of
>>> those pesky compiler warnings (on HP-UX a killer), but I'll release t=
he
>>> package somewhat later when I'm convinced it works.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> John Kraal
>>>
>>>
>>> Harrie Hoogeveen wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I had a question about the built-in entity references. You support, =
as
>>>> told on the website only a few:
>>>>
>>>> " &s; ' > <
>>>>
>>>> Q1: I was wondering why is it not & and &apo; as in the standard=
?
>>>>
>>>> For example a lot of parsers do not understand &s; but do underst=
and
>>>> &
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Now, I have to adapt my xml, or the VTD code. I am looking at this
>>>> function getCharResolved() from VTDNav.
>>>>
>>>> If you look at the swich, after the & sign, it detects this:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *case* 'a' :
>>>>
>>>> ch =3D getCharUnit(offset);
>>>>
>>>> *if* (ch =3D=3D 'm') {
>>>>
>>>> *if* (getCharUnit(offset + 1) =3D=3D '=
p'
>>>>
>>>> && getCharUnit(offset + 2) =3D=3D
>>>> ';') {
>>>>
>>>> inc =3D 5;
>>>>
>>>> val =3D '&';
>>>>
>>>> } *else*
>>>>
>>>> *throw* *new* NavException("ille=
gal
>>>> builtin reference");
>>>>
>>>> } *else* *if* (ch =3D=3D 'p') {
>>>>
>>>> *if* (getCharUnit(offset + 1) =3D=3D '=
o'
>>>>
>>>> && getCharUnit(offset + 2) =3D=3D=
's'
>>>>
>>>> && getCharUnit(offset + 3) =3D=3D
>>>> ';') {
>>>>
>>>> inc =3D 6;
>>>>
>>>> val =3D '\'';
>>>>
>>>> } *else*
>>>>
>>>> *throw* *new* NavException("ille=
gal
>>>> builtin reference");
>>>>
>>>> } *else*
>>>>
>>>> *throw* *new* NavException("illegal
>>>> builtin reference");
>>>>
>>>> *break*;
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Which in translation is amp; and apos;
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Now it realy is getting confusing.
>>>>
>>>> If a put &s; in my xml, it throws an exception any way:
>>>> =E2=80=9Cjavax.ejb.EJBException: com.ximpleware.EntityException: Err=
ors in
>>>> Entity: Illegal builtin reference=E2=80=9D on line 499 in VTDGen.
>>>>
>>>> If I put & in my xml I get a: =E2=80=9CNavException: Invalid ent=
ity
>>>> char=E2=80=9D on
>>>> line 830 in VTDNav.
>>>>
>>>> Of which you can see the code above, which should work for &.
>>>>
>>>> Also the & is supported in VTDNav, if I see correct on line 740,
>>>> but
>>>> also gets a exception
>>>>
>>>> What is going on?
>>>>
>>>> Mabey it=E2=80=99s in this piece of code on line 729 in VTDNav:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ch =3D (*int*)l;
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *if* (ch !=3D '&')
>>>>
>>>> *return* l;
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have some time to correct this. What is the problem? Why did you
>>>> block
>>>> it out like that?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Harrie Hoogeveen
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------=
----
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----
>>>>
>>>> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services,
>>>> security?
>>>> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your
>>>> job easier
>>>> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache
>>>> Geronimo
>>>> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&=
dat=3D121642
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------=
----
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Vtd-xml-users mailing list
>>>> Vtd...@li...
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vtd-xml-users
>>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------=
---
>> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, securi=
ty?
>> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
>> easier
>> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache
>> Geronimo
>> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&da=
t=3D121642
>> _______________________________________________
>> Vtd-xml-users mailing list
>> Vtd...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vtd-xml-users
>>
>=20
>=20
--=20
Met vriendelijke groeten,
With kind regards,
John Kraal
Programmer
Kewill Interchain
A member of the Kewill Group of companies
(T) +31 (0)78 6 123 310
(E) jk...@in...
(W) www.interchain.nl
IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail, and each of any attachments transmitted
with it, is confidential, is the property of Kewill Interchain, and is
intended solely for the information of the individual/entity to whom
this e-mail is addressed. It may also be privileged or protected by
other legal rules. If you have received it by mistake, please notify the
author immediately by replying to this e-mail and then destroy/delete
this e-mail and all attachments (if any). If you are not the intended
recipient you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print, or rely
on this e-mail. In accordance with Kewill Interchain's internal policy
e-mails sent and/or received may be monitored. Whilst Kewill Interchain
takes reasonable precautions (including use of anti-virus software) it
accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage should this e-mail
contain any virus, or similar destructive or mischievous code. (c)
Kewill Interchain 2006.
|
|
From: Jimmy Z. <cra...@co...> - 2006-11-06 18:03:12
|
Thanks for pointing that out, I have to look at the code again, it may =
be a bug that
you discovered...
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Harrie Hoogeveen=20
To: vtd...@li...=20
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 1:46 AM
Subject: [Vtd-xml-users] built-in entity references
Hello,
I had a question about the built-in entity references. You support, as =
told on the website only a few:
" &s; ' > <
Q1: I was wondering why is it not & and &apo; as in the standard?=20
For example a lot of parsers do not understand &s; but do =
understand &=20
=20
Now, I have to adapt my xml, or the VTD code. I am looking at this =
function getCharResolved() from VTDNav.
If you look at the swich, after the & sign, it detects this:
=20
case 'a' :
ch =3D getCharUnit(offset);
if (ch =3D=3D 'm') {
if (getCharUnit(offset + 1) =3D=3D 'p'
&& getCharUnit(offset + 2) =3D=3D =
';') {
inc =3D 5;
val =3D '&';
} else
throw new NavException("illegal =
builtin reference");
} else if (ch =3D=3D 'p') {
if (getCharUnit(offset + 1) =3D=3D 'o'
&& getCharUnit(offset + 2) =3D=3D =
's'
&& getCharUnit(offset + 3) =3D=3D =
';') {
inc =3D 6;
val =3D '\'';
} else
throw new NavException("illegal =
builtin reference");
} else
throw new NavException("illegal builtin =
reference");
break;
=20
Which in translation is amp; and apos;
=20
Now it realy is getting confusing.
If a put &s; in my xml, it throws an exception any way: =
"javax.ejb.EJBException: com.ximpleware.EntityException: Errors in =
Entity: Illegal builtin reference" on line 499 in VTDGen.
If I put & in my xml I get a: "NavException: Invalid entity char" =
on line 830 in VTDNav.
Of which you can see the code above, which should work for &.
Also the & is supported in VTDNav, if I see correct on line 740, =
but also gets a exception
What is going on?
Mabey it's in this piece of code on line 729 in VTDNav:
=20
ch =3D (int)l;
=20
if (ch !=3D '&')
return l;
=20
I have some time to correct this. What is the problem? Why did you =
block it out like that?
=20
Harrie Hoogeveen
=20
=20
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----
=
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, =
security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job =
easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache =
Geronimo
=
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D=
121642
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----
_______________________________________________
Vtd-xml-users mailing list
Vtd...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vtd-xml-users
|
|
From: Jimmy Z. <cra...@co...> - 2006-11-06 18:05:51
|
getCharResolved returns a long, upper 32 bit is the offset value of the
detected
char or entity, lower 32 bit is the actually char detected, this is a
rewrite in v1.7
it eliminates a instance variable which was shared among many different
things...
the other thing, I have been doing a lot of comment conversion from // to /*
*/ :)
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Kraal - Kewill Interchain NL" <jk...@in...>
To: "Harrie Hoogeveen" <Har...@KB...>
Cc: <vtd...@li...>
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 2:35 AM
Subject: Re: [Vtd-xml-users] built-in entity references
> In the new code this actually has nothing to do with "&s;" - there is
> no such check, my guess it's a typo of the website. It does have to do
> something with offsets:
>
> For the package I built, add a ++ after offset in getChar() (in the
> function getCharResolved())
>
> Example, it was this:
>
> static Long getCharResolved(VTDNav *vn,int offset){
> exception e;
> int ch = 0;
> int val = 0;
> Long inc =2;
> Long l = getChar(vn,offset);
>
> Change it to:
>
> static Long getCharResolved(VTDNav *vn,int offset){
> exception e;
> int ch = 0;
> int val = 0;
> Long inc =2;
> Long l = getChar(vn,offset++);
>
> I'm not sure if this'll work on older versions.
>
> In a new version I threw in a bunch of typecasts too, to get rid of
> those pesky compiler warnings (on HP-UX a killer), but I'll release the
> package somewhat later when I'm convinced it works.
>
> Regards,
> John Kraal
>
>
> Harrie Hoogeveen wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I had a question about the built-in entity references. You support, as
>> told on the website only a few:
>>
>> " &s; ' > <
>>
>> Q1: I was wondering why is it not & and &apo; as in the standard?
>>
>> For example a lot of parsers do not understand &s; but do understand
>> &
>>
>>
>>
>> Now, I have to adapt my xml, or the VTD code. I am looking at this
>> function getCharResolved() from VTDNav.
>>
>> If you look at the swich, after the & sign, it detects this:
>>
>>
>>
>> *case* 'a' :
>>
>> ch = getCharUnit(offset);
>>
>> *if* (ch == 'm') {
>>
>> *if* (getCharUnit(offset + 1) == 'p'
>>
>> && getCharUnit(offset + 2) == ';') {
>>
>> inc = 5;
>>
>> val = '&';
>>
>> } *else*
>>
>> *throw* *new* NavException("illegal
>> builtin reference");
>>
>> } *else* *if* (ch == 'p') {
>>
>> *if* (getCharUnit(offset + 1) == 'o'
>>
>> && getCharUnit(offset + 2) == 's'
>>
>> && getCharUnit(offset + 3) == ';') {
>>
>> inc = 6;
>>
>> val = '\'';
>>
>> } *else*
>>
>> *throw* *new* NavException("illegal
>> builtin reference");
>>
>> } *else*
>>
>> *throw* *new* NavException("illegal
>> builtin reference");
>>
>> *break*;
>>
>>
>>
>> Which in translation is amp; and apos;
>>
>>
>>
>> Now it realy is getting confusing.
>>
>> If a put &s; in my xml, it throws an exception any way:
>> “javax.ejb.EJBException: com.ximpleware.EntityException: Errors in
>> Entity: Illegal builtin reference” on line 499 in VTDGen.
>>
>> If I put & in my xml I get a: “NavException: Invalid entity char” on
>> line 830 in VTDNav.
>>
>> Of which you can see the code above, which should work for &.
>>
>> Also the & is supported in VTDNav, if I see correct on line 740, but
>> also gets a exception
>>
>> What is going on?
>>
>> Mabey it’s in this piece of code on line 729 in VTDNav:
>>
>>
>>
>> ch = (*int*)l;
>>
>>
>>
>> *if* (ch != '&')
>>
>> *return* l;
>>
>>
>>
>> I have some time to correct this. What is the problem? Why did you block
>> it out like that?
>>
>>
>>
>> Harrie Hoogeveen
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
>> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
>> easier
>> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache
>> Geronimo
>> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Vtd-xml-users mailing list
>> Vtd...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vtd-xml-users
>
> --
> Met vriendelijke groeten,
> With kind regards,
>
> John Kraal
> Programmer
>
> Kewill Interchain
> A member of the Kewill Group of companies
>
> (T) +31 (0)78 6 123 310
> (E) jk...@in...
> (W) www.interchain.nl
>
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail, and each of any attachments transmitted
> with it, is confidential, is the property of Kewill Interchain, and is
> intended solely for the information of the individual/entity to whom
> this e-mail is addressed. It may also be privileged or protected by
> other legal rules. If you have received it by mistake, please notify the
>
> author immediately by replying to this e-mail and then destroy/delete
> this e-mail and all attachments (if any). If you are not the intended
> recipient you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print, or rely
> on this e-mail. In accordance with Kewill Interchain's internal policy
> e-mails sent and/or received may be monitored. Whilst Kewill Interchain
> takes reasonable precautions (including use of anti-virus software) it
> accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage should this e-mail
> contain any virus, or similar destructive or mischievous code. (c)
> Kewill Interchain 2006.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
> easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> Vtd-xml-users mailing list
> Vtd...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vtd-xml-users
>
|
|
From: Jimmy Z. <cra...@co...> - 2006-11-06 18:14:58
|
It is actually a typo on the vtd-xml project page, teh right entity is &
not &s...
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Kraal - Kewill Interchain NL" <jk...@in...>
To: "Harrie Hoogeveen" <Har...@KB...>
Cc: <vtd...@li...>
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 2:35 AM
Subject: Re: [Vtd-xml-users] built-in entity references
> In the new code this actually has nothing to do with "&s;" - there is
> no such check, my guess it's a typo of the website. It does have to do
> something with offsets:
>
> For the package I built, add a ++ after offset in getChar() (in the
> function getCharResolved())
>
> Example, it was this:
>
> static Long getCharResolved(VTDNav *vn,int offset){
> exception e;
> int ch = 0;
> int val = 0;
> Long inc =2;
> Long l = getChar(vn,offset);
>
> Change it to:
>
> static Long getCharResolved(VTDNav *vn,int offset){
> exception e;
> int ch = 0;
> int val = 0;
> Long inc =2;
> Long l = getChar(vn,offset++);
>
> I'm not sure if this'll work on older versions.
>
> In a new version I threw in a bunch of typecasts too, to get rid of
> those pesky compiler warnings (on HP-UX a killer), but I'll release the
> package somewhat later when I'm convinced it works.
>
> Regards,
> John Kraal
>
>
> Harrie Hoogeveen wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I had a question about the built-in entity references. You support, as
>> told on the website only a few:
>>
>> " &s; ' > <
>>
>> Q1: I was wondering why is it not & and &apo; as in the standard?
>>
>> For example a lot of parsers do not understand &s; but do understand
>> &
>>
>>
>>
>> Now, I have to adapt my xml, or the VTD code. I am looking at this
>> function getCharResolved() from VTDNav.
>>
>> If you look at the swich, after the & sign, it detects this:
>>
>>
>>
>> *case* 'a' :
>>
>> ch = getCharUnit(offset);
>>
>> *if* (ch == 'm') {
>>
>> *if* (getCharUnit(offset + 1) == 'p'
>>
>> && getCharUnit(offset + 2) == ';') {
>>
>> inc = 5;
>>
>> val = '&';
>>
>> } *else*
>>
>> *throw* *new* NavException("illegal
>> builtin reference");
>>
>> } *else* *if* (ch == 'p') {
>>
>> *if* (getCharUnit(offset + 1) == 'o'
>>
>> && getCharUnit(offset + 2) == 's'
>>
>> && getCharUnit(offset + 3) == ';') {
>>
>> inc = 6;
>>
>> val = '\'';
>>
>> } *else*
>>
>> *throw* *new* NavException("illegal
>> builtin reference");
>>
>> } *else*
>>
>> *throw* *new* NavException("illegal
>> builtin reference");
>>
>> *break*;
>>
>>
>>
>> Which in translation is amp; and apos;
>>
>>
>>
>> Now it realy is getting confusing.
>>
>> If a put &s; in my xml, it throws an exception any way:
>> “javax.ejb.EJBException: com.ximpleware.EntityException: Errors in
>> Entity: Illegal builtin reference” on line 499 in VTDGen.
>>
>> If I put & in my xml I get a: “NavException: Invalid entity char” on
>> line 830 in VTDNav.
>>
>> Of which you can see the code above, which should work for &.
>>
>> Also the & is supported in VTDNav, if I see correct on line 740, but
>> also gets a exception
>>
>> What is going on?
>>
>> Mabey it’s in this piece of code on line 729 in VTDNav:
>>
>>
>>
>> ch = (*int*)l;
>>
>>
>>
>> *if* (ch != '&')
>>
>> *return* l;
>>
>>
>>
>> I have some time to correct this. What is the problem? Why did you block
>> it out like that?
>>
>>
>>
>> Harrie Hoogeveen
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
>> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
>> easier
>> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache
>> Geronimo
>> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Vtd-xml-users mailing list
>> Vtd...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vtd-xml-users
>
> --
> Met vriendelijke groeten,
> With kind regards,
>
> John Kraal
> Programmer
>
> Kewill Interchain
> A member of the Kewill Group of companies
>
> (T) +31 (0)78 6 123 310
> (E) jk...@in...
> (W) www.interchain.nl
>
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail, and each of any attachments transmitted
> with it, is confidential, is the property of Kewill Interchain, and is
> intended solely for the information of the individual/entity to whom
> this e-mail is addressed. It may also be privileged or protected by
> other legal rules. If you have received it by mistake, please notify the
>
> author immediately by replying to this e-mail and then destroy/delete
> this e-mail and all attachments (if any). If you are not the intended
> recipient you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print, or rely
> on this e-mail. In accordance with Kewill Interchain's internal policy
> e-mails sent and/or received may be monitored. Whilst Kewill Interchain
> takes reasonable precautions (including use of anti-virus software) it
> accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage should this e-mail
> contain any virus, or similar destructive or mischievous code. (c)
> Kewill Interchain 2006.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
> easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> Vtd-xml-users mailing list
> Vtd...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vtd-xml-users
>
|
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X