XSD is definitely going to come out in the next several releases...
and the challenge ahead is to make it not just usable, but persistent
and high performance... and the possibility of ASIC implemenation
is going to be explored
for version 2.0 we will introduce VTD+XML feature... and any suggestion
on the core API implementation is very welcome...
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Tomsic" <pt...@gm...>
To: "Jimmy Zhang" <cra...@co...>
Cc: <vtd...@li...>
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 10:50 AM
Subject: Re: xerces discussion on VTD
>i agree on the getting out of the cave, per se.
> python does a great job of handling XML via it's etree implementation,
> and there's really not much competition for it. since java's got a
> different xml implementation around every corner, then it's easy to
> dismiss something other than one's that ppl recognize (SAX/DOM/etc)
>
> i'd love to see VTD support XSD's, specifically schema validation, and
> the ability to determine backward compatibility within an XSD. I've
> yet to find something that can determine if an XSD is backward
> compatible or not.
>
>
>
> On 1/17/07, Jimmy Zhang <cra...@co...> wrote:
>> Thanks. It would take sometime to take VTD seriously...
>> Given that DOM and SAX are so bad for so long, people
>> have literally got used to them... and sometime had a tough
>> time getting out of the "cave."
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Paul Tomsic" <pt...@gm...>
>> To: <vtd...@li...>; <cra...@co...>
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 6:17 AM
>> Subject: xerces discussion on VTD
>>
>>
>> > interesting thread, thought you might want to comment if you've not
>> > seen
>> > it:
>> >
>> > http://www.nabble.com/VTD-XML-thoughts--tf2816326.html
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
|
