From: Rodrigo C. <rn...@gm...> - 2007-03-19 03:40:23
|
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> <title></title> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> In fact the idea occured to me in the past also... but VTD is so fast reading large files anyway! With a fast processor I think we might be disk-limited rather than processor-limited. Still, if the code is made already, the option seems cute enought to keep :-)<br> <br> Since I mainly deal with large files requiring a lots of processing this has not been an issue. Others, in different environments, might disagree.<br> <br> Jimmy Zhang wrote: <blockquote cite="mid006301c768f7$a8ca75c0$0d02a8c0@ximpleware" type="cite"> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; "> <meta content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16414" name="GENERATOR"> <style></style> <div><font face="Arial">Fernando, The option for storing VTD in a separate file </font><font face="Arial"> is open. </font></div> <div><font face="Arial">I attached the technical document from your last email, and am </font><font face="Arial">also </font></div> <div><font face="Arial">interested in the </font><font face="Arial">suggestions/comments from the </font><font face="Arial">mailing </font><font face="Arial">list ...</font> </div> </blockquote> <br> </body> </html> |