Re: [Vtd-xml-users] xerces discussion on VTD

[Jimmy Z. <cra...@co...>]

I am also wondering if anyone in this list has come across a case
where performance of WS implementation is important...
so far there seems bits and pieces of evidences, not really anything
concrete and real...any suggestions on where to collect those anecdotal
evidences...
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tatu Saloranta" <cow...@ya...>
To: "Jimmy Zhang" <cra...@co...>
Cc: <vtd...@li...>
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 12:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Vtd-xml-users] xerces discussion on VTD


> --- Jimmy Zhang <cra...@co...> wrote:
>
>> Can Woodstox's XSD implementation be readapted as a
>> general purpose
>> XSD validator??
>
> Woodstox only implements DTD support natively, Schema
> and RNG are handled using other libraries.
> For validation, it uses MSV (Sun Multi-Schema
> Validator) as a plug-in, using a simple wrapper. That
> is why I thought it actually might also make sense for
> VTD. It may not be as fast as having native support,
> but anyone doing validation should expected some
> additional performance overhead (IMO).
> Of course, it is possible to start with a plug-in, and
> given more time, implement native support.
>
> Actually, I still haven't finished up W3C Schema
> integration, only RelaxNG integration. This because
> Schema is bit more invasive, as it needs to accesss
> attributes in elements (xsi:type, schemaLocation),
> whereas RNG is more modular.
>
>> Also how is the name of "woodstox" created? Does it
>> have anything to
>> do with the musical festival? :)
>
> :-)
>
> Kind of, and also, the character from Peanuts cartoon.
> I think one of my co-workers suggested it, starting
> from "Stax". I think another alternative someone
> suggested was "Fastax".
>
> -+ Tatu +-
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love
> (and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list.
> http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265
>