From: Jimmy Z. <cra...@co...> - 2007-01-17 19:31:03
|
Can Woodstox's XSD implementation be readapted as a general purpose XSD validator?? Also how is the name of "woodstox" created? Does it have anything to do with the musical festival? :) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tatu Saloranta" <cow...@ya...> To: "Paul Tomsic" <pt...@gm...>; "Jimmy Zhang" <cra...@co...> Cc: <vtd...@li...> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 10:56 AM Subject: Re: [Vtd-xml-users] xerces discussion on VTD > --- Paul Tomsic <pt...@gm...> wrote: > > ... >> i'd love to see VTD support XSD's, specifically >> schema validation, and >> the ability to determine backward compatibility > > I don't think it absolutely must be implemented by VTD > itself however. But it should be possible to integrate > something like Multi-Schema Validator, to validate VTD > trees (against W3C Schema, or Relax NG). > >> within an XSD. I've >> yet to find something that can determine if an XSD >> is backward >> compatible or not. > > Likewise, this sounds like task for a schema > processing tool, and writing one is probably even more > work than writing efficient parsers. I think > separation of concerns is good. > > -+ Tatu +- > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Get your own web address. > Have a HUGE year through Yahoo! Small Business. > http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/domains/?p=BESTDEAL > |