From: Paul T. <pt...@ya...> - 2006-10-23 18:57:18
|
i see. so is that a forthcoming feature set or is that available currently in the 1.7 release? --- Jimmy Zhang <cra...@co...> wrote: > If the goal is to parse the XML file once and use it > repetitively > without re-parsing, VTD+XML is a simple, small XML > index > that can be persisted on disk... > > The spec is http://vtd-xml.sf.net/persistence.html > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Paul Tomsic" <pt...@ya...> > To: <vtd...@li...> > Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 5:50 AM > Subject: Re: [Vtd-xml-users] design question/best > practice > > > > well, by caching i mean in-memory. > > guess that's my question. is it better to parse > once, > > then store the xml as a stringBuffer or something? > > > > when you say "VTD+XML" for caching, is there an > > example or unit test you could refer me to? > > > > thanks > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support > web services, security? > > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated > technology to make your job > > easier > > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 > based on Apache Geronimo > > > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > > _______________________________________________ > > Vtd-xml-users mailing list > > Vtd...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vtd-xml-users > > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com |