Re: [Vtd-xml-users] design question/best practice

[Jimmy Z. <cra...@co...>]

What do you mean by "caching?" In memory or on disk?
One feature VTD will offer is called VTD+XML, which
is a way to avoid repetitive parsing... But VTD+xML still
needs to be stored on disk...
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Paul Tomsic" <pt...@ya...>
To: <vtd...@li...>
Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2006 8:27 AM
Subject: [Vtd-xml-users] design question/best practice


> what would be the recommended approach to using VTD
> within an application that retrieves values from a
> large amt of XML files over-and-over?
>
> obviously, hitting the disk and reparsing the desired
> XML continually would be less than ideal, one would
> think.
>
> would parsing the files once, and caching them as, say
> a stringbuffer be a recommendation, then simply having
> VTD use the cached string buffer to retrieve the xpath
> be good?  or is caching them simply not the best
> approach, and VTD will perform equally as well with a
> cache versus going to disk and rescanning the file?
>
> thanks
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job 
> easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> Vtd-xml-users mailing list
> Vtd...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vtd-xml-users
>