Re: [Vtd-xml-users] Need more arbitrary random access

[tony y. <gao...@gm...>]

 more comments.....
<root>
   <child>
      <grandchild1 />
      <grandchild2 />
   </child>
   <child>
      <grandchild1 />
      <grandchild2 />
   </child>
 </root>
I insist on the VTD-XML have some features to implement. for the reason
below:
  1. When I store all nodes' index, I need create many objects to reference
the indexes, as for the above xml, I need 7 objects to denote the whole tree
structure if you can't provide me round-trip cursor movement. And yes, the
memory usage will significant small than others even though I create the
objects because just 32 bits int spaces and no redundant object created .
But it doesn't make any sense against its initial design concept.
I mean the VTD-XML project must reconsider the structure to support more
flexible cursor-like xml parser. like ResultSet class .
  2. Cannot lazy-load the children nodes if xml doc is big enough.

 As for DOM implementation, yes they can do all things like that.


-- 
Kindly Regards

Tony
===============================