Menu

Once again SAX wanted

Horst
2006-03-23
2013-05-15
  • Horst

    Horst - 2006-03-23

    Hallo,

    first i want to say that vtd is a great approach in xml processing and a great implementation. But for me there is a big problem to use vtd inside of xml pipelining implementations. I don't have to consider the problem of to big for memory documents, so this is no argument for me not to use the fast SAX Processing (see faq). Nevertheless i need the very compact xml representation of vtd and it's possible fast serialization chance. I want to use it inside of cocoon or orbeon xml pipelines, which are all SAX based, to hold the SAX Events in a compact representation, change it with a short xpath and to fire it again to the next pipeline step. So i'am sure there is a great demand for this use case. This may open the needed access to vtd for other xml based technologies. So i hope you bring yourself to implement a ContentHandler, that builds vtd without parsing and something like a SAXWriter that is able to fire SAX Event from a given vtd.

    Maybe that is a new aspect in your discussion about SAX (may be not)

    Greetings Horst

     
    • jimmy zhang

      jimmy zhang - 2006-03-24

      Thanks for the input.. we will keep that in mind for future releases...

       

Log in to post a comment.