|
From: Jean M. <jm...@pl...> - 2003-09-03 18:37:55
|
hi On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 00:15:04 +0800, ide wrote > It is calamity when missing keyfile,so encrypt virtdisk with=20 > password only is good idea,can it come true? not sure this is feasible, imho. but i'm no coder. why not backing up keyfile offsite ? > The other questions: > 1,How big file vncrypt can support?10G=A1=A220G=A3=BF or more? i experienced up to 80Go, my guess is that it can even work with bigger d= isks bad luck it's slow to read/write data encrypted, but one can't have=20 performance and security at the same time > 2=A3=ACCan it work stable under 4.8 and 5.1 or higher? works fine, afaik, under 4.x, i was unable to compile it for 5.1, so i ha= d to=20 dump files from one box to another when i upgraded my system to 5.1 > 3,The virtdisk was made under 4.8, would it be used under 5.1 or higher= ? can't reply to this, but with GEOM/BDE now existing in 5.x i doubt it. it= =20 already seems that tcfs, from the ports also, has been abandonned. i don'= t=20 know if vncrypt is still supported or at least will be upgraded to 5.x or= =20 follow the same path. there is not much talk in the ML since i applied, s= o... -J. -- No trees were destroyed in the sending of this message, however a significant number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced. |