[Vnc2swf-users] vnc2swf vs. vnc2swf.py (final)

[Aleksey K. <ako...@ma...>]

Hi  Yusuke,

I agree that  vnc2swf.py is less convenient=20
(http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=3D8291133&forum_id=
=3D44174)=20
and I don't understand why to develop the software reducing it functionalit=
y:=20
vnc2swf has -immediately option by default and is much faster and correct=20
than vnc2swf.py: recording OO presentation with many static scenes vnc2swf.=
py=20
do not catch a slide transition moment very often and swf become incorrect=
=20
with wrong slide transition delays.=20

I forced to use vnc2swf-0.4.2 cause it more faster and convenient for=20
recording and it makes correct swf and I found src.rpm for it. With=20
vnc2swf-0.4.2 recorded swf I able even to calculate precise frame No. by it=
s=20
appearing time. With pyvnc2swf-0.6.4 fame/time correlation is unpredictable.

So now I use vnc2swf-0.4.2 with edit.py from pyvnc2swf-0.6.4.

=2D-=20
=D0=A1 =D1=83=D0=B2=D0=B0=D0=B6=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=B8=D0=B5=D0=BC,
=D0=90=D0=BB=D0=B5=D0=BA=D1=81=D0=B5=D0=B9.