Re: [Vnc2swf-users] Support of SVG or other free formats ?
Status: Alpha
Brought to you by:
euske
From: Yusuke S. <yu...@cs...> - 2005-09-01 17:59:10
|
MF <mag...@gm...> wrote: > Hi, > > I've been playing with vnc2swf for the past few days and would like to > ask if there are plans to support creating SVG files instead of SWF. I'd > like to use this in other projects where the target audience would not > have a flash player and I am concerned about the legal aspects of > reading and creating SWF files, as many may have seen in this recent > article: > http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/08/29/2339216 Yes, I've read that article, too. I agree with you in that we could have a better open format instead of SWF. For screen recording, however, perhaps MNG format is more appropriate, because SVG lacks a bitmap fill support. But MNG also lacks audio streaming. Currently SWF is the only format which supports both animation and audio, but I am not a zealous advocate of this format. Especially I want to use OGG format instead of MP3, which is currently impossible with SWF. Here's an interesting comparison between SVG and SWF: http://www.carto.net/papers/svg/comparison_flash_svg/ > Perhaps this is not the place to start a huge "Flash vs. SVG" or > "Gratis, under-NDA vs. Free, Open" endless debate, but I'd like some > indication of the direction vnc2swf would have. I have aproject in mind > where I could justify some funding to have an SVG version, is this > something others would also chip in ? Well, believe or not, I'm definitely pro-open or free format. And I think adding supports for other formats to pyvnc2swf now is relatively easy because of its nice redesign ;) Maybe I can look into those specs this weekend, and figure out how we could support any of them. Yusuke |