visualpython-users

[Visualpython-users] Visual and Python 3.x

[Bruce S. <Bru...@nc...>]

I occasionally do searches to see what the status of numpy is for Python 3.x, 
since without numpy it's not possible to build Visual for Python 3.x. What I 
read today is that it is unlikely that numpy will be ported to Python 3.x until 
late 2010.

Of course we have a more immediate problem that we can't even get Visual to work 
with Python 2.6.3.

Bruce Sherwood

Re: [Visualpython-users] Visual and Python 3.x

[Scott D. D. <Sco...@Ac...>]

Bruce Sherwood wrote:
> I occasionally do searches to see what the status of numpy is for Python 3.x, 
> since without numpy it's not possible to build Visual for Python 3.x. What I 
> read today is that it is unlikely that numpy will be ported to Python 3.x until 
> late 2010.
> 
> Of course we have a more immediate problem that we can't even get Visual to work 
> with Python 2.6.3.

There is a 2.6.4 coming out, you could check release candidate 2.6.4rc2

--Scott David Daniels
Sco...@Ac...

Re: [Visualpython-users] Visual and Python 3.x

[Guy K. K. <g....@ma...>]

On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:29:28 Scott David Daniels wrote:
> There is a 2.6.4 coming out, you could check release candidate 2.6.4rc2
> 

Karmic is on 2.6.4 already. Didn't work with that one. I'm assuming that some 
incompatible changes were made, and Boost trips up over them.

Guy

-- 
Guy K. Kloss
Institute of Information and Mathematical Sciences
Te Kura Pūtaiao o Mōhiohio me Pāngarau
Massey University, Albany (North Shore City, Auckland)
473 State Highway 17, Gate 1, Mailroom, Quad B Building
voice: +64 9 414-0800 ext. 9585   fax: +64 9 441-8181
G....@ma... http://www.massey.ac.nz/~gkloss

Re: [Visualpython-users] Visual and Python 3.x

[Scott D. D. <Sco...@Ac...>]

Guy K. Kloss wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:29:28 Scott David Daniels wrote:
>> There is a 2.6.4 coming out, you could check release candidate 2.6.4rc2
> Karmic is on 2.6.4 already. Didn't work with that one. I'm assuming that some 
> incompatible changes were made, and Boost trips up over them.

According to
     http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-October/093188.html
the problem may be fixed by moving to the very most recent Boost (the
__doc__ property of a class is no longer writable).  If that's not it,
that entire thread may have clues that help this work.

--Scott David Daniels
Sco...@Ac...