From: Thomas P. <tho...@in...> - 2005-05-13 11:18:30
|
Hi folks, first of all: thanks a lot for this great tool! What I was missing most was an EPS output, so I I just added a screenshot feature to vpython using gl2ps ( http://www.geuz.org/gl2ps/ ). Are you interested in the changes? Should I send some diff files to the current cvs? Cheers, Tom -- Thomas Pohl, Lehrstuhl fuer Informatik X (Systemsimulation), Universitaet Erlangen, Cauerstr. 6, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany phone: +49(0)9131 85-28687 fax: +49(0)9131 85-28928 url: http://www10.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/~pohlt/ |
From: Jonathan B. <jbr...@ea...> - 2005-05-13 16:39:53
|
On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 13:18 +0200, Thomas Pohl wrote: > Hi folks, > first of all: thanks a lot for this great tool! > > What I was missing most was an EPS output, so I > I just added a screenshot feature to vpython using > gl2ps ( http://www.geuz.org/gl2ps/ ). Are you interested > in the changes? Should I send some diff files to the > current cvs? Can you post a link to some examples showing the PS output and a plain screenshot of the VPython window for comparison? Thanks, -Jonathan |
From: Thomas P. <tho...@in...> - 2005-05-17 13:21:46
|
Hiho, ok, here are two examples: http://www10.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/~pohlt/vpython/ Remark: The PDF versions slightly differe from the screenshot since they have been created separately. As you can see (also from the file sizes ;-/), it's not just a wrapped bitmap file but real vector graphics. The EPS/PDF output can be tuned by lots of parameters in gl2ps. I haven't had the time to find the optimal values, but the results look pretty usable for me. Tomorrow, I will also put the diff files online, since some people seem to be interested in this feature. Cheers, Tom Jonathan Brandmeyer wrote: > On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 13:18 +0200, Thomas Pohl wrote: > >>Hi folks, >>first of all: thanks a lot for this great tool! >> >>What I was missing most was an EPS output, so I >>I just added a screenshot feature to vpython using >>gl2ps ( http://www.geuz.org/gl2ps/ ). Are you interested >>in the changes? Should I send some diff files to the >>current cvs? > > > Can you post a link to some examples showing the PS output and a plain > screenshot of the VPython window for comparison? > > Thanks, > -Jonathan > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes > Want to be the first software developer in space? > Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7393&alloc_id=16281&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Visualpython-users mailing list > Vis...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/visualpython-users > > -- Thomas Pohl, Lehrstuhl fuer Informatik X (Systemsimulation), Universitaet Erlangen, Cauerstr. 6, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany phone: +49(0)9131 85-28687 fax: +49(0)9131 85-28928 url: http://www10.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/~pohlt/ |
From: Bruce S. <Bru...@nc...> - 2005-05-17 16:56:54
|
I was unable to read the eps files into Adobe Illustrator, which hangs. Something is wrong with the format (or with Adobe Illustrator). The quality of the image is basically defined by the number of triangles VPython chooses to use to create spheres, etc., so that at ordinary sizes I see little difference between the screen capture and the pdf (I was unable to view the eps version), though of course when I blow up the pdf by a large factor it doesn't get more jagged as the screen capture bitmp image would. The export to Pov-Ray using the module available at vpython.org produces much better final images, because the image is ray-traced and doesn't depend on the triangles used to render the VPython scene in real time. Bruce Sherwood Thomas Pohl wrote: > Hiho, > ok, here are two examples: > http://www10.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/~pohlt/vpython/ > > Remark: The PDF versions slightly differe from the screenshot > since they have been created separately. > > As you can see (also from the file sizes ;-/), it's > not just a wrapped bitmap file but real vector graphics. > The EPS/PDF output can be tuned by lots of parameters > in gl2ps. I haven't had the time to find the optimal > values, but the results look pretty usable for me. > > Tomorrow, I will also put the diff files online, since > some people seem to be interested in this feature. > > Cheers, > Tom > > Jonathan Brandmeyer wrote: > >> On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 13:18 +0200, Thomas Pohl wrote: >> >>> Hi folks, >>> first of all: thanks a lot for this great tool! >>> >>> What I was missing most was an EPS output, so I >>> I just added a screenshot feature to vpython using >>> gl2ps ( http://www.geuz.org/gl2ps/ ). Are you interested >>> in the changes? Should I send some diff files to the >>> current cvs? >> >> >> >> Can you post a link to some examples showing the PS output and a plain >> screenshot of the VPython window for comparison? >> >> Thanks, >> -Jonathan >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes >> Want to be the first software developer in space? >> Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! >> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7393&alloc_id=16281&op=click >> _______________________________________________ >> Visualpython-users mailing list >> Vis...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/visualpython-users >> >> > |