From:
<fre...@gb...> - 2007-12-25 10:16:03
|
On mardi 25 d=E9cembre 2007, Bruce Sherwood wrote: > Could you give a more complete statement of your suggestion? It is > already the case that there are several different anaglyph modes > (redblue, redcyan). Are you saying that given particular red-cyan > filters, whose "red" and "cyan" are of course just approximations, you > might hope to achieve better color separation by using red+some+green" > (say) and "cyan+some_red"? Yes, that's the point. I can also be a work-arround for non-calibrated=20 monitors... > Note that while red-blue has large=20 > separation, it is essentially monochrome, whereas the red-cyan version > provides some colors by adding white to both views, thus giving pastel > colors but avoiding the case of a red ball having no image for the cyan > eye. I didn't know that. Stereo is really a very interesting point, and I'm sure= =20 in will be the next image revolution. > Some months ago someone pointed out various failings of the current > anaglyph implementation (for which I'm responsible), and at some point > I'd like to follow up on that critique. But it's currently VERY low > priority..... I understand! =2D-=20 Fr=E9d=E9ric http://www.gbiloba.org |