From: Bruce S. <Bru...@nc...> - 2006-11-20 23:36:29
|
Yup. It had been a while since I looked to see whether there was a binary version. I've updated vpython.org to reflect the new situation. Bruce Martin Costabel wrote: >Mark Hammond wrote: > > >>I did finally get Vpython working... and it wasn't all that hard. As I >>mentioned in my earlier post, I used the expert installation instructions >>on my daughter's new MacBook (which has the latest version of X11 on it). >>It didn't work. I followed Bruce's suggestions, finding that vpython and >>python were apparently not where they should be (I guess not on my hard >>drive at all). I opened Fink Commander and followed the easy non-Intel >>instructions, installing visualpython2.4 from binaries. It worked fine. >> >>So I'm not sure why the need for the expert/Intel instructions. >> >> > >There is indeed no need right now. Binaries for >visual-py2[34]-3.2.9-1002 exist for both ppc and intel on the Fink >bindist server. The instructions on the web page are from some months >ago when there was no intel binary package yet. Plus, it is somewhat >hard to verify, because the Fink package database web page pretends not >to know the existence of any binary version of visual-pyXX-3.2.9 for OSX >10.4. This is a known bug of the package database (shows only packages >in "release", not in "current".) > >But I would still like to understand why building from source ("expert >instructions") did not work. It should, too. > > > |