|
From: Gary P. <gp...@ri...> - 2004-11-24 19:49:32
|
Many of you have probably seen the recent unveiling of "MacEnthon" http://www.scipy.org/wikis/featurerequests/MacEnthon It's a all-in-one scientific package for python, similar to Enthought Python for windows, including scipy, matplotlib, ipython .... The author says that "The goal is to make something that a user can install and have running without installing anything else, so it is going to use the pre-installed Python (or install its own in the case of Python 2.4)." It is a "framework" package. I use the Mac less and less these days, but it is a fixture around here, so it won't go away. I've been *more* than comfortable with the fink set-up, and in fact, I wish the MacEnthon effort was a fink package. But it's not. The advertised ease of setup of MacEnthon has *great* appeal: single click installation. I think the attraction to MacEnthon is going to be enormous, leaving us to decide between a complete (too much, in fact) scientific environment installed with a single click, *without* vpython, versus the rather pesky fink vpython, along with a raft of other individual packages, some of which are not updated regularly. So ... is this new development providing enough reason to develop a "framework" vpython? (Asked in ignorance of the technical details, and a sense of the level of effort needed.) -gary |