From: Kuzminski, S. R <SKu...@fa...> - 2004-06-01 18:52:57
|
I suppose they are very different pieces of software and one of the nice things about vpython is how focused it is. I'm wishing that I could build more complex shapes, especially with Boolean shape operations, assemble them into mechanisms and have them simulated in a 'real' environment. This is probably out of the scope of vpython. =20 S =20 -----Original Message----- From: vis...@li... [mailto:vis...@li...] On Behalf Of Arthur Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 10:43 AM To: vis...@li... Subject: re: [Visualpython-users] openCASCADE =20 =20 =20 _____ =20 From: Arthur [mailto:aj...@ix...]=20 Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 1:42 PM To: 'Kuzminski, Stefan R'; 'vis...@li...' Subject: RE: [Visualpython-users] openCASCADE =20 From: vis...@li... [mailto:vis...@li...] On Behalf Of Kuzminski, Stefan R Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 10:57 AM To: vis...@li... Subject: [Visualpython-users] openCASCADE =20 Has anyone looked into bringing the OpenCASCADE python bindings into vpython? =20 http://www.pythonizer.org/pythoncascade/pythoncascade.html =20 =20 =20 =20 To what end ? =20 Don't OpenCASCADE and VPython have very different purposes and scopes. =20 I tend to see the "smallness" and focus of VPython as one of its main strengths. =20 =20 And if one wants to work with something broad and large, what does VPython bring to OpenCascade that isn't already there? The question's intention being more than rhetorical, as I don't know anything about OpenCascade beyond what I see on the web site. =20 Art |