From: Arthur <ajs...@op...> - 2003-02-19 03:15:26
|
> I had the vague notion that ScITE is Windows-specific -- right or wrong? Windows and Linux GTK. Mac out in the cold, once again. > > Highlighting Visual keywords might be nice, but it is really the high > interactivity of idlefork that matters to me. Anything that offers one-key > edit/run cycles is what I want, and what I want for my students. Is that > possible with ScITE? Absolutely. Out of the box, it works with about 25 languages. One thing I do in my cusotmization is narrow it down to 1 - Python. F5 is "Go" - run Python against the current script. Cntrl 1 runs a Python syntax check. No "seperate process" issues as in the standard IDLE, that as per your posting - confirmed by own own testing of alpha2 - have not been corrected yet in the merged IDLE. (Though I am confident it will be.) And the opportunity to go much further down the road toward VPython specific customization beyond simple keyword syntax highlighting - like VPython word completion (cntrl enter), hints, etc. A good counter argument is the importance of IDLE's inactive prompt. Which I happen to believe *is* important. I happen to use IDLE only for that. And have never found it strange to use it only for that and something else for editing. But there is an argument to be made that an "all in one" tool has its advantages. PyGeo does not work at the interactive prompt the way VPython can. So perhaps I am prejudiced by that, and that IDLE does make more sense for VPython than it might for PyGeo. Anyway, more offering to lend assistance if you think the concept has merit - not selling it too heavily. Art |