From: Andrew M. <mor...@ph...> - 2003-02-18 16:47:56
|
On Tue, 2003-02-18 at 07:41, Bruce Sherwood wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >=20 > From: "Jonathan Brandmeyer" <jbr...@ea...> >=20 > > Arthur has convinced me that the right way to go for source and binary > > distributions is to provide a setup.py (or other appropriate mechanism, > > e.g, debs, windows exe) that does The Right Thing. IMO, The Right Thin= g > > is that which bears the same look and feel as other extension modules > > for a given platform. We may be able to provide binaries for only a fe= w > > platforms, so the source distribution must be clean. >=20 >=20 >=20 > It is possible that the only binary distribution we need is for Windows, > simply because that's almost the only platform where it is unlikely to fi= nd > a compiler. It's also the platform where the user is most likely to be a > novice with respect to Python and to programming. >=20 Is it possible to create a Vpython rpm (or deb) for easy linux installation? I know that wouldn't necessarily answer the question of where the demos and docs should go, but it might simplify installation problems for people new to Vpython. --=20 Andrew Morrison <mor...@ph...> |