Re: [Visualpython-users] History and Status?

[Bruce S. <bas...@un...>]

This sounds fine to me, too. And it would be fine on Linux, too, which has
much to recommend it.

Bruce Sherwood

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gary Pajer" <pa...@in...>
To: "vpusers" <vis...@li...>
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 5:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Visualpython-users] History and Status?


> > That leaves the question of where to put the Visual demos. Currently
> they're
> > in PythonXX\Programs\Demos, which is highly arbitrary. Moreover, the
> > Programs part has proven to be irrelevant, so that PythonXX\Demos would
> make
> > more sense. I don't discern any pattern on Windows that suggests where
> > Python demos should go. By default, I favor PythonXX\Demos\Visual, and
> start
> > to encourage developers of other packages to put associated demos in
> > PythonXX\Demos\SomePackage.
>
> Another two cents:  visual is the only package that uses
> PythonXX\Programs\Demos.
> More sensible to me is Pythonxx\Libs\site-packages\visual\demos
> IMHO, it doesn't sit right to have a catch-all Demo directory:
> \PythonXX\Demos.
> When I want to look for something about a package, I always start looking
in
> site-packages\packagename.  In fact, I prefer to see *everything*
associated
> with a package under site-packages\packagename, although the case for the
> docs is arguable.
>
> And I always look for packages in site-packages.  I think they all should
be
> there.
>
> -gary