From: Bruce S. <bas...@un...> - 2002-06-25 01:54:29
|
Absolutely! It was always the intention and hope that users would jump in with suggested improvements. So do please post your patch. Thanks. Bruce Sherwood At 11:08 AM 02/06/24 -0400, Arthur Siegel wrote: >Bruce writes - > > > Sounds like a useful idea. I'll put this on a to-do list. >Thanks! > >And thanks for the response. I do think that mag2 would be useful - a clue >in fact being its utilization in the cvisual code. I can send along a small >"patch" which exposes it to Python. > >Truth is I am first learning about extending Python via C++ by digging a bit >into the cvisual code. And am already doing other customizations. > >I would not like to have my (small) user base need to rely on my own >"forked" cvisual - especially since my changes are likely to be minor and >only add stuff, rather than change any existing functionality. > >I am therefore hoping that VPython can begin to come more of a collaborative >Open Source project. > >That is someone like myself proposing a change *and* submitting a patch - >with its acceptance opened up to discussion both as to the soundness of the >feature *and* its implementation. > >What you do think? > >Art |