RE: [Visualpython-users] rate() function

[Bruce S. <bas...@un...>]

Oops. I see I misread Dave Scherer's comment: 15 ms time slices have 
nothing to do with clock accuracy. The clock could be accurate to a 
microsecond yet with time slices allocated by Windows to processes with 15 
ms slop the clock accuracy is irrelevant.

Bruce Sherwood

At 11:22 AM 6/22/02 -0400, Bruce Sherwood wrote:
>The crux of the matter seems to be the question, what is the accuracy of 
>the Windows clock? On the Windows machine where I tried Gary's test 
>routine and saw the bizarre results he reported, I got 700 loop/sec with 
>no rate statement, which implies that one loop took 1.4 millisecond. If 
>the clock is accurate to microseconds, no problem. If the clock is 
>accurate to 15 ms (1/60 s?), it's hopeless.
>
>Bruce Sherwood
>
>At 03:45 PM 6/21/02 -0400, David Scherer wrote:
>>The time slices used by Windows are often on the
>>order of 15ms, which is quite a large margin of error in the type of
>>test you are doing.
>
>
>At 04:48 PM 6/21/02 -0400, Gary Strangman wrote:
>>Interestingly, replacing the rate() call in my previous program with a
>>spin-loop of the short you mentioned above (but based on time.clock(),
>>which on Windows is supposed to be accurate down to microseconds), I still
>>get the stair-stepping ...
>
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>Sponsored by:
>ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/
>_______________________________________________
>Visualpython-users mailing list
>Vis...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/visualpython-users