From: LUK S. <ce...@po...> - 2001-03-31 04:17:04
|
Bruce Sherwood wrote: > > >From what you say, it must be that there are significant differences > between Python 2.0 and Python 2.1. I think you're the first person to try > Python 2.1 as the base for Visual. Presumably we'll need to recompile under > Python 2.1 at some point. You comment that an older version of Numeric > doesn't work; it's not a surprise that Visual doesn't either. I've not tried python 2.1 (,yet) but (hope) may be the problem is only Numeric. I remember seeing that somewhere you have to get Numeric 18 to work with Python 2.1 > > This sounds a bit troubling. I have not followed Python itself closely > recently, but it doesn't sound wonderful if 2.1 invalidates modules that > worked on 2.0. I felt that too. BTW, does vpython compiled under win9x mingw/cygwin gcc? Good day, ST -- |