From: kirby u. <kir...@gm...> - 2012-04-17 18:04:37
|
> OK, I know, I forgot the octahedron... > Then, the subdivision of the faces you obtain into smaller ones should not > be too difficult. > > Jerzy Karczmarczuk > The triangles of a geodesic sphere e.g. subdivided icosahedron, are not equal area though, not exactly. Maybe exactness is not critical. There are lots of reflections so don't have to compute a full sphere. 1/120th is a common patch to reflect around, based on rhombic triacontahedron breaking into 4 triangles. There's a book coming out any day now, 'Divided Spheres' by Edward Popko that should have a lot of good info. Kirby http://www.amazon.com/Divided-Spheres-Geodesics-Orderly-Subdivision/dp/1466504293 > PS. People who want always have one nice mathematical formula for some > spherical problems too often forget that it is not necessary to have two > singularities at the poles, just one is possible with the stereographic > projection. But the distortions are awful... > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to > monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second > resolution app monitoring today. Free. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Visualpython-users mailing list > Vis...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/visualpython-users > |