From: K.-Michael A. <kmi...@gm...> - 2011-03-24 12:52:02
|
On 2011-03-24 02:04:11 +0100, Anton Sherwood said: > On 2011-3-23 16:55, Bruce Sherwood wrote: >> But I don't think POVray will provide quantitative information about >> the illumination at various places on the height field, will it? > > One might say that's the primary thing that Povray does provide (in such > a simple case). > > I don't remember whether Povray ordinarily takes into account the > distance between the light source and the object. It's not clear from > the inquiry whether that's desired here. I can calculate the distance to the sun myself, just need to know which points get light when. So I guess it's finally time to learn Povray *gulp*... > > It would seem simplest to skip the VP step and write a Povray > description of the height-field. Use an orthographic camera! Thanks all for your input! Best regards, Michael |