From: Guy K. K. <g....@ma...> - 2010-10-08 01:45:24
|
I've been awefully quiet in this whole discussion, even though I believe it was me who's stirred up some waves in trying to get some more Python sanity into Visual (sanity as in to behave like every other well behaved Python module does). Reading happily along, and I must say that C Anthony is speaking (writing) out *exactly* my feeling/impression. So there's no need to repeat that. (Thanks C Anthony!!!) Anyway, I like the proposal to make "visual" (the module) a convenience module that keeps backwards compatibility with the previously large local namespace, and make another one the well behaved "cleanroom" module, from which the "visual" module then pulls. Along those lines was also a good year (?) back my patch that I have provided to pull this off. As Visual (the project) is also commonly known as VPython, I think a suitable module name for the clean module would be either "vpython" or as also suggested "libvisual". Although the latter too much for me connotates with the shared library binary file on UN*X like systems. Guy -- Guy K. Kloss Institute of Information and Mathematical Sciences Te Kura Pūtaiao o Mōhiohio me Pāngarau Massey University, Albany (North Shore City, Auckland) 473 State Highway 17, Gate 1, Mailroom, Quad B Building voice: +64 9 414-0800 ext. 9266 fax: +64 9 441-8181 G....@ma... http://www.massey.ac.nz/~gkloss |