From: C A. R. <an...@ex...> - 2010-10-07 20:04:39
|
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Bruce Sherwood <bas...@nc...> wrote: > > For a large group of casual users, and for backward compatibility with > sizable numbers of programs in existence, it is important that "from > visual import *" continue to behave as it has in the past. i know you have stated this a few times, but i'm just not clear to this requirement. forgive my ignorance, as i'm neither a professor nor a student, only a professional developer, so my viewpoint is likely biased :-) what i don't understand, is how "from visual import *" actually makes anything easier for the student/learner. when someone (student) does that, they don't even know what they just did, until someone else (professor) tells them "ok, now this line will pull in X, Y, Z and the rest of the alphabet for you to use", what's the difference in simply explaining "ok, now pull/import the things you need; here is an exhaustive list of what you might need". either way the student must be explicitly told what is available. at least with explicit imports, they know exactly what is available in the current program. it seems much better in the long run for the personal development of the student to not only show how, but also _why_. but again, i have little experience directing others. C Anthony |