From: Stanley S. <ove...@ea...> - 2009-12-12 21:50:22
|
Acer has started selling a rather affordable laptop with a special 3D LCD screen. I remember reading a whitepaper a couple of years ago by the guys who inventing this type of display, if it's the same technology. The LCD screen has an additional layer in front which has alternating horizontal lines of polarizing filters so that even numbered display lines are polarized one way and odd numbered lines are polarized opposite. With appropriate drivers, the graphics chip shows left eye images polarized one way, then in the next frame the corresponding right eye image polarized opposite. By wearing simple polarized glasses that have left and right polarizing filters oriented at 90 degrees to each other, the observer sees stereoscopic 3D. The glasses are passive, not the active shutter type. The Acer has a 120 Hz display, so each eye is updated at 60 Hz, which is fast enough that no flicker would be seen. One drawback is that the vertical resolution is effectively cut in half in stereo mode since every other line is used. That is, the stereo mode would in effect be 1366 x 384, since the Acer specs say the "maximum resolution is 1336 x 768". Here's a link to one place that sells this new Acer: http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=5285802&CatId=4938. Try www.nextag.com to find competitive prices. By the way, if you are thinking of getting one of these and using it with other 3D glasses besides the ones that come with the laptop, be sure to get the correct type of polarizing 3D glasses -- some have the eyes oriented with the filters passing vertical and horizontal polarized light, but others have the filters oriented diagonally at 90 degrees to each other's polarization. I don't have the laptop myself, so I don't know which kind it needs. Does anyone know if this laptop would display Vpython's active-mode stereo correctly? I've only read about Vpython doing active stereo with the LCD shutter type of stereo, but it seems that this might be just the same from the API, with the driver and graphics chip just doing the alternating screens a different way at the display side. Stan Sokolow |