From: Bruce S. <Bru...@nc...> - 2009-02-09 19:02:18
|
Ah. I think it is the case that the Visual 5 spheres are rendered more carefully than those in Visual 3 (whose spheres often looked a bit angular), so I can imagine that with a very large number of spheres there would be a penalty. This is a good example of how very specific applications can be either faster or slower. Bruce Sherwood Guy K. Kloss wrote: > On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 06:40:00 Gary Pajer wrote: >> I have a subjective sense that it might be slower than 3.0. > > I have experienced the same thing. Particularly for huge sets of objects to be > visualised. I'm using VPython to visualise results of numerical simulations > and computations with potentially thousands to 100s of thousands objects. > > So for some I've switched from rendering spheres to points which hugely > improved performance again. > > But I guess my use case is less usual, so it may very well be that for > "normal" use cases 5.0 is faster than v 3. > > Guy > |