Menu
▾
▴
visualeiffel-devel — VisualEiffel developers list
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
(5) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|---|
|
From: Frieder M. <fm...@ob...> - 2005-06-10 15:35:12
|
At 05:14 10.6.2005, rapha wrote: >It is not easy to work through such an amount of code and perhaps it would >make sense, if someone from ObjectTools could assign a few small jobs to >interested (potential) developers it could help to motivate and find out >who could really help. And you (someone from ObjectTools) would help to >find into the project. Thats a good idea. We will discuss it. But, please use the list: vis...@ya... - there are much more readers. -- Frieder Monninger Object Tools GmbH fm...@ob... --- http://www.object-tools.com Nordstr. 5 - D 35619 Braunfels - fon +49 6472 911 030 fax 031 |
|
From: Frieder M. <fm...@ob...> - 2005-06-10 06:50:54
|
At 05:14 10.6.2005, you wrote: >Send Visualeiffel-devel mailing list submissions to > vis...@li... > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/visualeiffel-devel >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > vis...@li... > >You can reach the person managing the list at > vis...@li... > >When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >than "Re: Contents of Visualeiffel-devel digest..." > > >Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Visualeiffel-devel digest, Vol 1 #4 - 1 msg (Frieder Monninger) > 2. Re: Re: Visualeiffel-devel digest, Vol 1 #4 - > 1 msg (Raphael Mack) > >--__--__-- > >Message: 1 >Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 16:40:44 +0200 >To: vis...@li... >From: Frieder Monninger <fm...@ob...> >Subject: [Visualeiffel-devel] Re: Visualeiffel-devel digest, Vol 1 #4 - 1 msg > >At 05:14 9.6.2005, you wrote: > >This seems me to be a mailing-list characterized by a VERY low traffic... > >this is correct ... > > > >How many subscribed? > > >dont know ... > > >There's someone working on something? > >yes, we do - and as far I know some others also. > >But remember, that this list is only for developers. There is another >List for anyone - and there is the Wiki. Please use these media also ! > >-- >Frieder Monninger >Object Tools GmbH > >fm...@ob... --- http://www.object-tools.com >Nordstr. 5 - D 35619 Braunfels - fon +49 6472 911 030 fax 031 > > > >--__--__-- > >Message: 2 >Subject: Re: [Visualeiffel-devel] Re: Visualeiffel-devel digest, Vol 1 #4 - > 1 msg >From: Raphael Mack <rm...@st...> >To: vis...@li... >Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 21:45:13 +0200 > >Hello, > > > >How many subscribed? > >http://sourceforge.net/mail/?group_id=125637 sais "Approximate subscriber >count: 8" > > > >There's someone working on something? > > > > yes, we do - and as far I know some others also. > >that sounds great and triggers two questions: >- on what are you working concretely? >- Don't you use the CVS on sourceforge? > If you want ve to become "a "real" open source project" it would be > fair to let the others know what you are doing. >- who else is working on what? - wouldn't this list be exactly there to >tell about these things? I think there is no greater motivation brake than >seeing the work you have done senseless because someone else already did >it. (BTW this would be a waste of - very rare - resources.) >It is not easy to work through such an amount of code and perhaps it would >make sense, if someone from ObjectTools could assign a few small jobs to >interested (potential) developers it could help to motivate and find out >who could really help. And you (someone from ObjectTools) would help to >find into the project. > >I know these project managing tasks are not that interesting and a lot of >OpenSource projects ignore them. I'm excited to see whether VE will get >into the drive. - If it is easy to begin and one feels support from the >existing developers I guess it will result in more and better work. > > > But remember, that this list is only for developers. > >A (not that little) amount of communication could lead to better results >I guess and a dead mailing list is often a sign of a dead project. (I >understand that too much traffic on a list kills communication, too - >especially if its mainly noise and bashing each other, but until now it >doesn't seem to be that way.) > > > There is another > > List for anyone - and there is the Wiki. Please use these media also ! > >Where could one find the other list? > >Rapha > > > > >--__--__-- > >_______________________________________________ >Visualeiffel-devel mailing list >Vis...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/visualeiffel-devel > > >End of Visualeiffel-devel Digest -- Frieder Monninger Object Tools GmbH fm...@ob... --- http://www.object-tools.com Nordstr. 5 - D 35619 Braunfels - fon +49 6472 911 030 fax 031 |
|
From: Raphael M. <rm...@st...> - 2005-06-09 19:45:22
|
Hello, > >How many subscribed? http://sourceforge.net/mail/?group_id=125637 sais "Approximate subscriber count: 8" > >There's someone working on something? > > yes, we do - and as far I know some others also. that sounds great and triggers two questions: - on what are you working concretely? - Don't you use the CVS on sourceforge? If you want ve to become "a "real" open source project" it would be fair to let the others know what you are doing. - who else is working on what? - wouldn't this list be exactly there to tell about these things? I think there is no greater motivation brake than seeing the work you have done senseless because someone else already did it. (BTW this would be a waste of - very rare - resources.) It is not easy to work through such an amount of code and perhaps it would make sense, if someone from ObjectTools could assign a few small jobs to interested (potential) developers it could help to motivate and find out who could really help. And you (someone from ObjectTools) would help to find into the project. I know these project managing tasks are not that interesting and a lot of OpenSource projects ignore them. I'm excited to see whether VE will get into the drive. - If it is easy to begin and one feels support from the existing developers I guess it will result in more and better work. > But remember, that this list is only for developers. A (not that little) amount of communication could lead to better results I guess and a dead mailing list is often a sign of a dead project. (I understand that too much traffic on a list kills communication, too - especially if its mainly noise and bashing each other, but until now it doesn't seem to be that way.) > There is another > List for anyone - and there is the Wiki. Please use these media also ! Where could one find the other list? Rapha |
|
From: Frieder M. <fm...@ob...> - 2005-06-09 14:42:15
|
At 05:14 9.6.2005, you wrote: >This seems me to be a mailing-list characterized by a VERY low traffic... this is correct ... >How many subscribed? dont know ... >There's someone working on something? yes, we do - and as far I know some others also. But remember, that this list is only for developers. There is another List for anyone - and there is the Wiki. Please use these media also ! -- Frieder Monninger Object Tools GmbH fm...@ob... --- http://www.object-tools.com Nordstr. 5 - D 35619 Braunfels - fon +49 6472 911 030 fax 031 |
|
From: Federico T. <f.t...@gm...> - 2005-06-08 21:41:10
|
This seems me to be a mailing-list characterized by a VERY low traffic... How many subscribed? There's someone working on something? Thanks for your attention guys and sorry for my crappy english, Federico Tomassetti |
|
From: Raphael M. <rm...@st...> - 2005-04-28 12:00:32
|
Hello together, anybody here? I hope so - although there is not much traffic here. Please allow me to ask a few questions: - Who are you (developers)? - What do you think about the future of VE? - The CVS seems to be inactive for quite a few days. - Is anybody working on anything? What? - What is your position about the ECMA-Standard of Eiffel? - There is a worrying discussion about "forking the language" and therfore probably heat the "war" between different implementations on the smarteiffel list... I just wonder about the further development of Eiffel (the language, and the compilers) and the question whether there are mor vendors of Eiffelcompilers - an important point especially for industrial usage. Thanks, Raphael |
|
From: Thomas G. <th...@go...> - 2005-03-17 21:16:47
|
> I'd like to discuss the cvs commit discipline.
>
> 1. Every commit must have non empty message
> 2. The syntax of the message in the EBNF notation follows:
>
> <log_mesage> := ["#"TRACKER_ITEM_NUMBER{","
> TRACKER_ITEM_NUMBER}* (":" | "\n")] MESSAGE
>
> where
>
> TRACKER_ITEM_NUMBER is the ID of the bug report, feature
> request etc.
> MESSAGE is some sensible text
>
> Examples:
>
> cvs commit -m "#1,2: finally fixed"
> cvs commit -m "reformatting"
>
>
> Comments?
Sound good to me.
Thomas
|
|
From: Eugene M. <eug...@ma...> - 2005-03-16 07:22:07
|
Hi All,
I'd like to discuss the cvs commit discipline.
1. Every commit must have non empty message
2. The syntax of the message in the EBNF notation follows:
<log_mesage> := ["#"TRACKER_ITEM_NUMBER{"," TRACKER_ITEM_NUMBER}* (":" | "\n")] MESSAGE
where
TRACKER_ITEM_NUMBER is the ID of the bug report, feature request etc.
MESSAGE is some sensible text
Examples:
cvs commit -m "#1,2: finally fixed"
cvs commit -m "reformatting"
Comments?
--
Eugene
|
