Re: [VK]Re: Website

[Thomas S. <th...@eo...>]

> > I would like to use png, but this will restrict the
> > users to some browsers. So
> > should we follow the "Burn all GIFs" idea?
> Yes, through 'em way! A good browser with plugins can
> always view png's and we all don't want to be slaves
> of commercial algorithm-owners, ey!
> Any questions?

Yep. Does anyone know in how far current browsers support png?
Personally I wouldn't mind a change, I'm rather interested if this would
restrict the major part of our visitors.
Something really positive for my future www-activity: we're going to
have ADSL in some weeks (including flat), so I can finally change from
WIN to Linux once again (this damn SuSE-Netscape always crashed, so I
was forced to return to WIN *and I'm ashamed...*), download everything I
need (e.g. an original Mozilla) etc...

ok, that's it for now, see you

Thomas

-- 
...sent to you by ¥£ûÑÞ®ª×

EOAD Homepage:	www.eoad.de	ICQ:		32938629
Homepage:	thomas.eoad.de	Stasi-Aktennr.:	N. Warken fragen ;-)

	_¸,.«¬-·¹²³'"~°¨^´¯`^¨°~"'³²¹·-¬».,¸_
	_¸,.«¬-·¹²³'"~°¨^´¯`^¨°~"'³²¹·-¬».,¸_
	_¸,.«¬-·¹²³'"~°¨^´¯`^¨°~"'³²¹·-¬».,¸_
	_¸,.«¬-·¹²³'"~°¨^´¯`^¨°~"'³²¹·-¬».,¸_
	_¸,.«¬-·¹²³'"~°¨^´¯`^¨°~"'³²¹·-¬».,¸_
	_¸,.«¬-·¹²³'"~°¨^´¯`^¨°~"'³²¹·-¬».,¸_

...der EINZIGE schwarz-weiße Regenbogen der Welt!!!  :-)