I plan to reformat soon and use both Win2k and XP. I currently have 98 on my C:\ drive (old capture card) hence my FAT32 file system. In the post from nobody on Aug. 29, 2002, re: Virtual Linux startup problems it can be quoted as saying "...this uses a RAM drive as both the Win2K and XP boxes use NTFS." Now obviously this entity has NTFS, but what I'm after here is to find out which one is better? Is this bad lad optimized for anything, or what's going on? I am interested as well in some comprehensive downloadable (offline) documentation for my ancient laptop if all goes well, under an "instruction manual" heading on the download page. HTML with pics would be sweet, sort of a VL Fro Commandline Idiots, if ya know what I mean..! If anyone who knows has the time to do that it would be appreciated. This is my first post. There's a lotta love in here, dl'ing now.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
I plan to reformat soon and use both Win2k and XP. I currently have 98 on my C:\ drive (old capture card) hence my FAT32 file system. In the post from nobody on Aug. 29, 2002, re: Virtual Linux startup problems it can be quoted as saying "...this uses a RAM drive as both the Win2K and XP boxes use NTFS." Now obviously this entity has NTFS, but what I'm after here is to find out which one is better? Is this bad lad optimized for anything, or what's going on? I am interested as well in some comprehensive downloadable (offline) documentation for my ancient laptop if all goes well, under an "instruction manual" heading on the download page. HTML with pics would be sweet, sort of a VL Fro Commandline Idiots, if ya know what I mean..! If anyone who knows has the time to do that it would be appreciated. This is my first post. There's a lotta love in here, dl'ing now.